Date posted:09-12-11

The Secret Truths

The Spencers are an Elite bloodline family.    They are cousins of the Spencer-Churchills and related to the
Marlborough family at Blenheim Palace in Oxfordshire, where Winston Churchill was born. Other forebears included
the Duke of Marlborough, Sir Robert Walpole, and the Spencer family inherited a considerable fortune from Sarah,
Duchess of Marlborough. They also married into the Cavendish family, the Dukes of Devonshire at Chatsworth
House, and that offshoot became known as Spencer-Cavendish.

Diana  shared common ancestors with Prince Charles in the 3rd Duke of Devonshire and, most significantly, King
James I, the first Stuart king of England and Scotland and sponsor of Francis Bacon. It was King James who played a
highly influential role in the expansion of the Brotherhood, the formation of the Virginia Company which still controls
the United States, and the creation of the King James version of the Bible. Diana was also descended through several
lines from the Stuart kings, Charles II and James II, which connected her, as with James I, to the Merovingian bloodline
in France.

Charles II had so many children out of wedlock that goodness knows where some of their bloodlines are today. One
thing’s for sure, the Brotherhood will know. As Elite families go, the Spencers are an important bloodline and Diana
was related to countless aristocratic lines, including the Earls of Lucan. Further afield the Spencers have blood ties
with many leading American families and they are distantly related to the Rockefellers. They have a long history of
serving the monarch and the tradition continued with Diana’s father.

He was equerry to King George VI (who was married to the Queen Mother) and to Queen Elizabeth. Diana’s sister,
Jane, is married to Sir Robert Fellowes, the Queen’s Private Secretary at the time of Diana’s death. Both of Diana’s
grandmothers, the Countess Spencer and Ruth Lady Fermoy, were inner circle members of the Queen Mother’s
court, as were four of her great aunts. The Spencers and the Queen Mother were very close and it was Lady Fermoy
and the Queen Mother who manipulated Diana into her marriage with Prince Charles. This could be most significant
when you hear about the true nature of the Queen Mother.

The countdown to the marriage began when Diana met Prince Charles at Althorp while he was having a relationship
with her sister Sarah, in 1977. Diana was 16, but it was three years later that the Windsors really made their move on
her. With the Queen Mother and Lady Fermoy manipulating behind the scenes, she was invited to a dance at
Buckingham Palace to celebrate Charles’ 30th birthday. Then, in July 1980, a friend of Charles, Philip de Pass, asked
her to stay with them while the Prince was there. In Diana’s own words, Charles was all over her and “He leapt on me
practically”. He asked her to travel with him to Buckingham Palace the next day and an invitation followed to join the
Windsors in the September at Balmoral, their residence in Scotland.

Eventually Charles asked her to marry him and she accepted. “I love you so much” Diana said to him. “Whatever love
is” Charles replied.That is such a telling statement about the Windsors and the way they bring up their children. They
don’t understand love because they give and receive so little. Imagine being a young child and having to line up with
everyone else to shake your mother’s hand when she returned from an overseas visit.

That is how the Queen and Prince Philip treated Charles. Diana was a kindergarten nanny when the story of the
relationship broke in the media and her life in the public eye and the constant spotlight had begun. So had her
nightmare with the Windsors. Looking back, Diana could see that Charles had never been genuine in his affection for
her. She realised even before the wedding that he was having a relationship with his real love, Camilla Parker-Bowles,
and this continued and grew during their marriage.

Charles and Camilla communicated using the code ‘Gladys and Fred’. Camilla, like the Windsors, is close to the
Rothschilds and on the first anniversary of Diana’s death, she was on the lonian island of Corfu enjoying the
hospitality of Lord Jacob Rothschild. He has also spent £16 million leasing and restoring the Spencer’s 18th century
mansion overlooking Green Park in London, close to Buckingham Palace.

The Windsors wanted Diana to produce heirs with Spencer genes and that was all she was to them: an incubator. A
week after her engagement to Charles, her bulimia began. This is an eating disorder in which you make yourself sick
every time you eat food. Diana was throwing up three or four times a day and became desperately thin. As I
mentioned in an earlier chapter, many victims of childhood sexual and Satanic abuse suffer from bulimia later in life.

She said that the bulimia was ‘triggered’ when Charles put his hand on her waist and said “Oh, a bit chubby here,
aren’t we?” Bulimia is a disease of the emotions, as most diseases are, and Diana was in emotional turmoil even
before the wedding. She described the attitude of Charles like this:

“He’d found the virgin, the sacrificial Iamb, and in a way he was obsessed with me.
But it was hot and cold, hot and cold. You never knew what mood it was going
to be, up and down, up and down... He was in awe of his mama, intimidated by his
father, and I was always the third person in the room.”

She met her sisters and told them she couldn’t go through with the marriage, especially with Camilla still on the scene,
but they said she had no choice because “Your face is on the tea towels and you’re too late to chicken out”. Before
the wedding, Diana stayed at Clarence House, the London residence of the Queen Mother. When she had arrived no-
one was there to welcome her, she said, it was like going to a hotel.

Diana and Charles were married in St Paul’s Cathedral on July 29th 1981. That morning at Clarence House she said
she felt calm, deathly calm: “I felt I was a lamb to the slaughter. I knew it, and I couldn’t do anything about it”. What
prophetic words those would prove to be. They spent the first night of their honeymoon at the Mountbatten family
estate at Broadlands in Hampshire before sailing around the Greek islands in the royal yacht Britannia (Barati). The
bulimia got worse and she considered suicide, such was the scale of her unhappiness.

“My husband made me feel so inadequate in every possible way that each time I came up for air he pushed me down
again. I hated myself so much”.

One of Diana’s royal duties in 1982 was to represent the Queen at the funeral of Princess Grace of Monaco, another
victim of Brotherhood murder when the brakes on her car failed. Princess Grace, formerly the actress Grace Kelly,
ran the Monaco branch of the Order of the Solar Temple with Jean Louis Marsan, the close friend of her husband,
Prince Rainier.

The Windsors got what they wanted when Prince William was conceived. Diana was told that the birth had to be
induced to fit in with Charles’ polo playing programme and the blond-haired, blue-eyed William was born on June 21st
1982, the summer solstice. Now first of all, what kind of father and husband insists that his wife and son be given
needless drugs to suit his polo diary? And secondly, does anyone believe that was really the reason?

The Windsors are obsessed with astrology and the esoteric arts to such an extent that the psychic-astrologer mother
of an Irish friend of mine could predict with uncanny accuracy the colours the Queen and Queen Mother would be
wearing every day. She was correct again and again because she knew the colours connected to each day according
to esoteric law. A family so steeped in Satanism, the esoteric mysteries, and the Sun cult, induce the heir to ensure
he is born on the summer solstice, when the Sun is at the peak of its power, and that’s just a coincidence? No way.

He was christened William (after the Black Nobility William the Conqueror)
Arthur (after the Sun God symbol, King Arthur) Philip (after the Duke of Edinburgh)
Louis (after Louis Mountbatten). William’s first serious girlfriend, according to the
British press, was Emma Parker-Bowles, the niece of his father’s lover, Camilla.

Prince Harry was born in September 1984 and Diana’s usefulness to the Windsors was over.

“Then suddenly as Harry was born it just went bang, our marriage, the whole thing went down the drain”, she told
Andrew Morton.

Diana and Charles separated in 1992 and divorced on August 28th 1996. Almost exactly a year later she was dead.

Diana lived in apartments at Kensington Palace or ‘KP’ as she called it. Prince Michael of Kent, the Grand Master of
English Freemasonry, has his home there, also. The Brotherhood-Windsor machine attempted to destroy Diana’s
credibility and public esteem. A tape of an intimate telephone conversation between her and the car dealer, James
Gilbey, was released through the media in 1992. On the tape Diana said that Charles was a real torture. She told

“I’ll go out and conquer the world, do my bit in the way I know how and leave him behind”.

But despite, perhaps because of, the efforts to discredit her, Diana’s popularity continued and grew. Her unique
combination of a big heart, a global public profile, and an intense desire to settle a score with the Windsors,
threatened the very survival of royalty. Her natural compassion and empathy with people were putting the emotionless
Windsors in the shade and exposing them as out of date and irrelevant.

The naive, shy 19-year-old, who was enticed into the Windsor web, was now a woman who was realising her true
power and was prepared to use it. She took the issue of landmines from obscurity to the front pages across the world
and she had the platform to do that with any subject she chose. To the Windsors and the Brotherhood, this lady was
dangerous with a capital D. She also knew many intimate secrets of the Windsors and the establishment. She knew
where the bodies were buried as they say, and she had shown in her famous interview with the BBC current affairs
programme, Panorama, in November 1995, that she was prepared to reveal some of them.

That interview, in which she talked of her unhappy relationship with the royal family in very forthright terms, did
immense harm to the Windsors and they must have wondered what on earth she would do next. In my travels around
the world I met a man who had a call from Diana in March 1997, a few months before she died. He was amazed when
she said it was the Princess of Wales and he didn’t believe her at first, especially when she said that she was calling
from a ‘supermarket phone’ in England. But Diana and this man had a mutual friend, and a close confidant of Diana
told me that she often rang people from public phones, particularly from a department store in Kensingston, when she
wanted to be certain the conversation would not be tapped.

Diana admired this man for his wisdom and knowledge. She said she had something to reveal that would shake the
world and she wanted his advice on how best to do it. He will not reveal what she told him, but when I said that I knew
she was aware of the Windsors’ connection to global drugs trafficking, he said: “Oh no, it was much worse than that”.
You might get an idea of what it could have been later in this chapter. Diana knew far more than people realise, as we
shall also see. But that was only one level of the plot to kill Diana.

At the highest level of the black magicians who control the Brotherhood networks, I have no doubt that her death had
long been planned according to their ancient and deeply sick ritual. These two levels, the practical need to remove
her (lower initiates) and the need for a ritual killing of the ‘goddess Diana’ (highest initiates) would run side by side,
exactly as they did with President Kennedy.

The final sequence of events which led to her death involves, at almost every turn, a man called Mohamed Al Fayed,
the Egyptian ‘owner’ of Harrods, the top people’s store in Knightsbridge, London, and the father of Dodi Fayed who
died in the crash with Diana. Al Fayed also owns the Ritz Hotel in Paris. This is the guy who bleats on and on about
the need for “truth” and “justice” over the death of Diana and yet he would not recognize truth if it bit him on the bum.

You can always tell when Mohamed Al Fayed is lying - his lips are moving. He fought a long, public, and vicious battle
for control of Harrods and the House of Fraser with Tiny Rowland, the head of another Brotherhood front, Lonrho, the
London-Rhodesia company, which has been responsible for so much manipulation of Africa and Africans. At one
stage there was a Department of Trade and Industry inquiry into the Harrods takeover and it concluded:

“The lies of Mohamed Fayed and his success in ‘gagging’ the press created a new fact: that lies were the truth and
the truth was a lie”.

This would be a suitable epitaph for what Private Eye, the British satirical magazine and others, have dubbed: The
Phony Pharaoh. The report also revealed that Al Fayed had lied about his family background. He had claimed to
come from a wealthy Egyptian family and it was this money, he said, that he was using to buy Harrods. In fact he
comes from a far from rich family and he didn’t have any such money of his own. He was born on January 27th 1929
in Alexandria, the son of a school inspector.

He sold Coca-Cola in the streets and later knocked on doors selling Singer sewing machines. It was an introduction to
Adnan Khashoggi, now the world’s most famous arms broker, which changed his life. Khashoggi was the son of the
personal physician to the King of Saudi Arabia and the Khashoggis employed ‘Al’ Fayed (then Mohamed Abdel
Moneim Fayed) in their business ventures.

He later fell out with the Khashoggi family, apparently, and proceeded to lie his way through a stream of business
deals which made him a lot of money from setting up deals for others and taking a commission. The construction
company, Costain, was one of his main sources of income in the early days, but he made nothing like as much money
as he claimed to be worth. See Tom Bower’s book, Fayed, The Unathorised Biography, for the detailed background.

Al Fayed’s involvement with the Haiti dictator, Papa Doc, led to interest in his activities by the CIA. One CIA report on
him remarked that:

“He strikes one as being friendly and evil at the same time”.

While he became wealthy by the standards of the rest of the population, he did not have nearly enough of his own
money to buy Harrods and he used the wealth of the Sultan of Brunei, one of the richest men in the world. It was the
Sultan who provided the money for Harrods and Al Fayed also acted for him in the purchase of the prestigious
London hotels, the Savoy and the Dorchester. Al Fayed may act the big tycoon, but in the biggest game he is a
‘gofer’ who takes orders and does as he’s told.

This is fascinating because we are led to believe that Mohamed Al Fayed and the Queen are on different sides and
oppose each other over what happened to Diana. Funny, then, that Mohamed Al Fayed is subordinate to the Sultan
of Brunei and the Queen of England is a friend of the Sultan of Brunei. She went to stay with him between September
16th and 20th in 1998.32 What is going on here? Al Fayed’s most prominent sycophantic media poodle is the Daily
Mirror which has acted as his personal newsletter.

The Mirror made strenuous efforts to secure an interview with me in June 1998, despite my initial reluctance. But
when I made my thoughts about Al Fayed known to the reporter, the article was dropped by the Editor, Piers Morgan,
who personally conducts the Mirror interviews with Al Fayed.

Doing as you are told by the very rich and powerful and using highly unscrupulous business methods, has proved
extremely profitable for Al Fayed. He owns a fleet of bullet proof Mercedes, a £3.5 million Sikorski helicopter, a £13
million Gulfstream Jet, a £15 million yacht, The Jonikal, castles and 50,000 acres in Scotland, and expensive homes in
Gstaad, New York, Dubai, Geneva, Gerona, London, Surrey and Los Angeles, all fully staffed and equipped.

Balnagown, his Scottish castle, is close to Loch Ness. As long as he does as he is told and is useful to the
Brotherhood his wealth will continue. If he doesn’t - gone. They will hang him out to dry. Another source of income for
the Fayeds, again interconnected with the Sultan of Brunei, is arms dealing. Al Fayed’s former brother-in-law and
Dodi’s uncle, Adnan Khashoggi, the infamous Saudi arms dealer and fixer, has arranged weapons sales, legal and
illegal, worth multibillions of dollars. Many of the discussions for such deals take place at the Ritz Hotel in Paris owned
by Mohamed Al Fayed (or the Sultan?).

This is one reason why Al Fayed has the Ritz bugged to eavesdrop on his VIP guests. In fact, he has everything
bugged, as we’ll see. He is deeply involved in brokering arms sales and Dodi was often an unofficial broker for arms-
for-oil deals between the Gulf states and America.  Adnan Khashoggi is a close associate of George Bush and
bankrolled part of Bush’s ‘Iran-Contra’ arms-for-drugs operation in the 1980s.

George Bush, in turn, is a bosom buddy of the Queen and Prince Philip. Al Fayed is involved in many underground
deals and plots involving events, people, and subjects that he is desperate to ensure remain secret. Certainly not a
man to trust under any circumstances, in my view. I should emphasize, too, that the Islamic elite, like the Sultan of
Brunei, are significant players in the Brotherhood pyramid and the Grand Lodge at Cairo is one of the most powerful
secret society centres in the world.

This is hardly surprising given the Brotherhood’s obsession with ancient Egypt and it’s ritual and symbols. The
reptilian bloodlines may be predominantly Aryan, but they are far from exclusively so. They work through streams
within all races, the Arabs and the ‘Jews’ most certainly among them. One of the predominant secret societies in the
Arab world is the Order of the Mystic Shrine or the ‘Shriners’.   

They are connected to the Knights Templar, and the York and Scottish Rites of Freemasonry. Among their members
in the United States have been President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his successor President Harry S. Trueman.
There is also a Prince Hall Shrine for black members of the Brotherhood, including that self-styled spokesman for the
black community in the United States, Jesse Jackson.

Al Fayed has served the interests of the Brotherhood and the establishment in a number of ways while presenting an
anti-establishment public profile. For instance it was he who exposed the two Conservative MPs, Neil Hamilton and
Tim Smith, who were taking money to ask certain questions in the House of Commons. This is quite illegal. Al Fayed
knew that this was true because he was the one giving them the money!

This story did enormous harm to the Conservative Government and did much to help the Brotherhood chosen one,
Tony Blair, to a landslide victory for the Labour Party at the following General Election. Al Fayed has also escaped
prosecution so far for a growing number of allegations from young female members of staff at Harrods that he
sexually assaulted them. His obsession with sex is legendary. One girl, 17-year old Samantha-Jane Ramsay, said that
when she complained to her supervisor that she had been groped by Al Fayed, the supervisor sighed: “Another one”.

Al Fayed sacked her for making the complaint, as he does all those who speak out against his sexual molestation and
style of business ‘management’. John Monks the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, said that at
Harrods there was “A regime of fear and terror”. When Samantha-Jane took her complaint to the local Marylebone
Police Station, she said that the officer told her: “You’re not the first to come to us. We have files inches high on Mr Al
Fayed, but no proof. It would be your word against his”.   A file inches high of different girls making the same
complaint about the same man would, I suggest, constitute rather more than “No proof”.

But Al Fayed, the man we are told the establishment would love to crush, survives untouched. So this is just some of
the background to the liar, double-dealer, sexual molester, Satanist and Sultan of Brunei front-man, who had
complete control of Diana’s security in the days and hours leading up to her death. I wouldn’t trust him with the
security of my cat. Indeed, as Tom Bower has documented, Al Fayed has ordered his hit men to shoot a cat he didn’t

Al Fayed had become close to the Spencer family through Diana’s father, Earl ‘Johnny’ Spencer, and stepmother
Raine. He helped ‘Johnny’ through financial difficulties and said he considered the Earl to be a brother. He had given
Raine, whom Diana couldn’t stand, a place on the Harrods board.

Al Fayed sponsored prestigious royal events like the Royal Windsor Horse Show and polo competitions, but he
especially backed the causes and charities supported by Diana. Bob Loftus, the head of security at Harrods between
1987 and 1996, told the British Channel Four programme, Dispatches, in June 1998, that he was ordered to tell Al
Fayed immediately if Diana came into the store. Al Fayed would then go to the department where she was shopping
and ‘accidentally’ meet her.

Every Christmas a green Harrods van would call at Diana’s home, Kensington Palace, with gifts for her and the boys
from ‘Uncle Mohamed’. When you look at the evidence, he made it his business to court the friendship of the Princess
of Wales in every way possible. On June 3rd 1997, he invited her to join him for a Summer holiday at his beach-side
villa in San Tropez in the south of France.

On June 11th he got the breakthrough he had been working so hard for: she accepted. The following day he
completed the purchase of a £15 million yacht, The Jonikal, through his Bermudan company Mohafa Shipping, and it
was on this boat that Dodi and Diana’s romance was soon to blossom.

On July 11th Diana arrived in San Tropez with her sons, William and Harry, to stay in an eight bedroom luxury
apartment on the ten acre Al Fayed estate on the exclusive Le Parc development. At this time, Dodi Fayed was still at
his apartment in Paris with his fiancée Kelly Fisher, the American model. The 41-year-old Dodi was a ‘gofer’ for his
father and lived on his father’s wealth, although he had enjoyed some success in the movie industry at one time as
the hands-off producer of the hit British film Chariots Of Fire, again thanks to his father’s money.

He had a playboy reputation and was a very big spender, once famously running up a $100,000 bill in two months on
his Amex card. He was dominated by his father and even in his film operation every decision had to be approved by Al
Fayed. Dodi did whatever his father told him to do.

He had been engaged to Kelly Fisher for eight months and she was expecting to spend her holiday on The Jonikal.
But on the evening of July 14th, Dodi took a phone call from his father who ordered him to go immediately to San
Tropez to be with Diana. Kelly Fisher described what happened next in an interview with the Dispatches programme:

“(Dodi) said he was going to London and he’d be back and then we were going to San Tropez. That evening he didn’t
call me and I finally got him on his portable phone. I said ‘Dodi where are you?’ and he said he was in London. I said
‘OK, I’ll call you right back at your apartment’. He said ‘No, no, don’t call me back.’ So I said ‘Dodi where are you?’ and
he admitted he was in the South of France. His father had asked him to come down and not bring me, I know now.”

Two days later Dodi sent a private plane to fly Kelly to San Tropez. But while he stayed with Diana, Kelly was kept
aboard another Fayed boat. “I’m sitting here stuck” she said. “So he had me in my little boat cage and he was, I know
now, seducing Diana.” On July 31st, Diana returned to San Tropez for a second holiday with Dodi, this time alone.
Kelly Fisher was back in Los Angeles preparing for her wedding to Dodi which she said was due to take place on
August 9th. But two days before that, the story broke in the world media of the romance between Dodi and Diana.

Kelly heard from a friend who saw a picture in the paper. She recalls:

“I started calling him in London because at this time I was expecting his arrival in a day. I called his private line, but
there was no answer. So then I called the secretary and asked to speak to him and she wouldn’t put me on. So
Mohamed got on and in so many horrible words told me to never call back again. I said ‘He’s my fiancee, what are you
talking about?’ He hung up on me and I called back and the secretary said don’t ever call here again, your calls are
no longer to be put through. It was so horrible.”

Ironically, Diana used to have Kensington Palace swept for listening devices and now she was in the clutches of a
man for whom bugging was an obsession. The Al Fayed villa in San Tropez was bugged, as were all Fayed
properties. Everything Diana said could be heard. Bob Loftus, the former Head of Security at Harrods, said that the
bugging there was “A very extensive operation” and was also always under the direction of Al Fayed.

Henry Porter, the London Editor of the magazine Vanity Fair, had spent two years investigating Al Fayed and he said
they came across his almost obsessive use of eavesdropping devices to tape telephone calls, bug rooms, and film
people. Through mutual friends, Porter warned Diana about Al Fayed’s background and activities “Because we
thought this was quite dangerous for her for obvious reasons”

But Diana apparently felt she could handle it and although she knew Al Fayed could “Sometimes be a rogue”, he was
no threat to her, she thought. He is rather more than a rogue and rather more often than ‘sometimes’. She apparently
told friends: “I know he’s naughty, but that’s all”. The Dispatches programme said they had written evidence that Al
Fayed bugged the Ritz Hotel and given his background and the deals that are hatched at the Ritz, it would be
staggering if he did not. Kelly Fisher said that the whole time she was in Fayed property she just assumed everything
was bugged.

It was known, she said, and Dodi had told her everywhere was bugged. She went on: “As a matter of fact, when I
confronted him about Diana, he said: ‘I can’t talk to you on the phone’. He said ‘I’ll talk to you in LA’. I knew what that

Diana was under the ‘protection’ of the Al Fayed security machine and even her most private conversations were
being monitored.

Diana went with Dodi to Al Fayed’s Elizabethan-style mansion called Barrow Green Court at Oxted in Surrey, formerly
owned by the Satanist Lord McAlpine. Throughout the house Al Fayed had placed statues of semi-naked Greek
goddesses. On August 21st, despite Henry Porter’s warning, Diana returned again to San Tropez for another holiday
with Dodi. Al Fayed was milking the situation, briefing journalists and photographers and enlisting the advice of
publicist Max Clifford. The Al Fayed machine was leaking the couple’s whereabouts to ensure maximum publicity.

Al Fayed complained after the crash that photographers and journalists would not leave the Princess alone, a
statement which, in the circumstances, beggars belief. The Diana-Dodi romance was now in full swing and Al Fayed
was urging his son to intensify the relationship.  And what Al Fayed said, Dodi did. Nothing was left to chance. Diana’s
favourite music, the theme from The English Patient, was played over and over as the couple cruised on The Jonikal.
Diana and Dodi had much in common. Both had been born into wealthy families and their fathers were distant figures.
Both had experienced the breakdown of their parents’ marriages as their mothers left home.

They even attended finishing schools close to each other in Switzerland. But we should not rule out the possibility of
mind manipulation techniques being used on both parties. I have met a number of former mind controlled slaves who
were programmed to fall madly in love with someone they normally would not even like and there are endless
examples of ‘love spells’ concocted by black magicians to cause someone to fall madly in love with them.

My scientist friend, Brian Desborough, tells me that the feeling of being in love is dependent upon the brain producing
phenylethylamine. This is a chemical which also diminishes the ability to discriminate effectively, hence the term ‘love
is blind’. Production of this chemical is sustained by the release of endorphins, a naturally occurring chemical linked
to memory, learning, pain suppression, sex drive and hormone regulation. If these chemicals could be stimulated in
both parties they would fall instantly in love.

I think there is a very good chance that something like this happened as the sting was set up for both of them. There
was talk of engagement in the air, but it is impossible to say how imminent that was, because reports conflict. I have
great doubts about that myself.

Diana and Dodi left the South of France from Olbia Airport at 1.3Opm on August 30th bound for Paris on Al Fayed’s
Gulfstream jet. They apparently intended to stay one night at Dodi’s apartment, which looks out on the Arc de
Triomphe, before going on to London where Diana was due to meet her sons. It was to be her last full day alive. The
plane touched down at Le Bourget Airport in Paris at 3.2Opm and they were met by 20 or so celebrity photographers
known as the paparazzi (from an Italian word meaning ‘buzzing insects’). A Mercedes was waiting for the party and a
green Range Rover was to follow on behind.

This is normal security procedure and the very minimum you would expect to protect someone so globally famous.
With Diana and Dodi in the Mercedes was Dodi’s bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones, the 29-year-old former member of
the elite British military regiment, the Paras or Parachute Regiment. Along with the SAS, the Paras are the most highly
trained (and therefore mind controlled) regiment in the British forces. In the Range Rover were the driver, Henri Paul,
the acting Head of Security at the Ritz, and another bodyguard, Kes Wingfield. They drove from the airport to the Villa
Windsor on the Bois de Boulogne, the former home of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.

The Duke and Duchess lived there after the duke, as King Edward VIII, abdicated the British throne when the
government and establishment would not accept his marriage to the America divorcee, Wallis Simpson. They then
moved to Paris as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. Their house is now owned by Mohamed Al Fayed and it is said
that he was going to give it to Dodi and Diana as a wedding present.

This talk of a wedding, however, is unsubstantiated, much as Al Fayed has sought to promote it. His publicity machine
led the public to believe the couple had spent time at Villa Windsor discussing decor, but the bodyguard Kes
Wingfield said that they only stayed there for “Around ten minutes”. From here they were driven to the Ritz Hotel
where they arrived at 4.20pm.

The Ritz is in the Place Vendome and all around that square at first floor level are symbols of the Sun and the cross,
very much like the symbols used by the ancients to symbolise the ‘journey’ of the Sun through the year which I
featured earlier in the book. This was the symbol of King Louis XIV, who was known as the ‘Sun King’. At his palace at
Versailles in the 17th century he decorated rooms in honour of Apollo, the Sun god, and Diana, the goddess of the

There was also a statue of the goddess Diana at Versailles. In the centre of the Vendome Square is an immense pillar
with a statue of Napoleon on the top and it mirrors the famous Nelson’s Column in Trafalgar Square, London. At this
stage Diana still had the same level of security that she’d had since the airport, but this could have been increased
considerably if support from the French High Protection Police Security Service (SPHP) had been requested. It is
there to protect VIPs visiting the city, but a request for their services must be made. It wasn’t.

All Diana’s security was provided by Al Fayed’s people from start to finish. If they had enlisted the protection of the
French police, Diana would still be alive. When a celebrity like Madonna visits Paris, the French Police have one car
in front of hers and another behind, together with two motorcycle riders front and back of the motorcade. The cars
are driven by trained drivers and they carry armed security men. According to reports, the SPHP made three, possibly
four, offers to protect Diana, but each one was refused by Dodi. Was he, himself, under instruction to reject these
offers from someone to whom he could not say no? An officer of the SPHP told Dodi: “If you will not use our car, we
recommend that two police cars accompany you on your excursions around the city.” This advice, too, was ignored.

Diana and Dodi went straight to the $6,000 a night 18th century Imperial Suite at the Ritz. From there, Diana rang her
friend, the Daily Mail journalist Richard Kay. She told him she intended to retire from public life in November and he
said that he had never heard her so happy. The couple booked a table at the Chez Benoit restaurant for 8.45pm and
they intended to spend the night at Dodi’s apartment.

At 6.30pm Dodi went across the Place Vendome to a jewellers, Repossi, to buy a diamond ring for Diana which was
later delivered to the Ritz. A little after 7 pm, the couple were driven in the Mercedes along the Champs Elysees to
Dodi’s apartment on Rue Arsene-Houssaye close to the Arc de Triomphe. Here they unpacked and prepared for
dinner. Again the back up Range Rover was there and so was another car carrying bodyguards for added protection.
Why was this level of security thought necessary in the early evening, but not in the early hours of the morning at the
time of the crash? Dodi’s apartment is known as the ‘Etoile flat’ after the Place de L’Etoile, the ‘Sun or star circle’ road
around the Arc de Triomphe.

The route they took to the apartment was out of the Place Vendome onto the Rue de Rivoli, and half way around the
Place de la Concorde they turned right onto the Champs Elysees and drove straight up that famous avenue to Dodi’s
apartment. Remember that route, it is crucially important. As they arrived at the apartment at 7.15pm, bodyguards
were seen to rush from their car to hold back six paparazzi. Diana and Dodi became concerned about eating at the
unprotected Chez Benoit restaurant and decided to head back to the Ritz to eat.

They took the same route back, down the Champs Elysees and around the Place de la Concorde. The couple, with
bodyguards Wingfield and Rees-Jones, walked into the Ritz, captured by the now famous video pictures, at 9.47pm.
As the paparazzi gather in numbers outside, amid rumours of an engagement announcement, Diana has already
started the last three hours of her life. Who was feeding the rumours and the whereabouts of Diana during the day to
create the paparazzi stampede that dominated Diana and Dodi’s movements and decisions that night? I think I can
guess, somehow. Al Fayed.

And who were some of these ‘paparazzi’ making life uncomfortable for Diana, thus changing the plans for the
evening? The Ritz security video also identified a number of people who had been outside among the onlookers for
most of the day and were still there on the edge of the crowd.

Now the plot seriously thickens. After speaking on the phone with his father at his estate in Oxted, Surrey, Dodi Fayed
announced a quite ludicrous plan. To avoid the paparazzi, the Mercedes which had been transporting them all day
together with the back up Range Rover were to be taken around the front of the hotel and used as a decoy for the
paparazzi. At the same time another Mercedes would be brought around to the back entrance of the hotel to whisk
the couple away to the apartment on the Champs Elysees.

Henri Paul, the 41-year-old acting head of security at the Ritz, was called on his mobile phone by Dodi and told to
report back to the hotel. He went off duty at 7pm and by the time he returned it was 10pm. No-one has established
where Paul was in those three hours. Dodi said that his father, Mohamed Al Fayed, had personally authorized that
Henri Paul should drive the Mercedes. For me, that is Dodi-speak for “My father told me this is how it is going to be”.
Henri Paul was not a qualified chauffeur and had no hire car permit. L. Fletcher Prouty, a former colonel in the US
Airforce who worked closely with the intelligence agencies, once said:

“No-one has to direct an assassination -it happens. The active role is played secretly by permitting it to happen. This
is the greatest single clue. Who has the power to call off or reduce the usual security precautions?”

Absolutely right. If we apply Prouty’s rule to Diana and ask who had the power and used that power - to reduce the
usual security precautions for her that night, we have a rather interesting answer: Mohamed Al Fayed. Given these
circumstances he must answer the obvious question: Why was this security reduced?

When President Kennedy was assassinated, there were no bodyguards standing on his car while four were standing
on the one immediately behind.  He was also in an open-topped car at a dangerous time in a dangerous city. When
Martin Luther King was shot dead at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 4th, 1968, the black police
officer in charge of security for King was sent home against his will hours before the shooting. The only two black
firemen at the station next to the motel were sent to other stations just for that day.

The scapegoat for this assassination was a guy called James Earl Ray. Not even King’s family
believed he was responsible. So much so that they attended his funeral a few years ago.

When Bobby Kennedy was murdered after making a speech at the Ambassadors Hotel
in Los Angeles on June 4th 1968, again the security arrangements were tampered with. The plan was for Kennedy to
walk off the stage and through the crowd to the exit. But immediately after the speech, Kennedy’s ‘aides’, especially
Frank Mankiewicz, insisted that it was safer for him to go out through the hotel kitchen.

When he walked into the kitchen he was met by the mind controlled Sirhan Sirhan with a gun in his hand. It is far more
likely that Bobby Kennedy was actually shot by members of his ‘security’ team, particularly Thane Eugene Caesar, the
‘security guard’ who was employed at the last minute and had endless connections into far right groups and the
intelligence community. But with Sirhan Sirhan at the scene with a gun, they had a mind controlled scapegoat to take
the rap and that was all they needed.

Sirhan Sirhan had been on a ‘mind expansion’ course with the Rosicrucians in the weeks before he was implicated in
Kennedy’s death (see .. .And The Truth Shall Set You Free). Frank Mankiewicz, who guided Kennedy to the kitchen,
was a former public relations man for the Mossad-front in America, the Anti Defamation League. He turned up later as
head of publicity for the Oliver Stone film, JFK, which claimed to be an expose of the assassination of President
Kennedy. It wasn’t. When the Israeli Prime Minister, Zitzhak Rabin, was shot dead by an assassin in Tel Aviv in 1995,
an extraordinary video taken by an onlooker showed how Rabin’s security detail stepped back in unison to leave the
assassin alone and free to kill his target.

You can see the pattern. And what happened in the crucial last minutes of Diana’s life? They withdrew her security on
the orders of Mohamed Al Fayed via his son. That is a fact. All day she had travelled in the same Mercedes with the
Range Rover as a back up vehicle. Now she would transfer to another Mercedes with no back up support whatsoever.
This was an extraordinary decision for a man obsessed with his own security. Bob Loftus, the former Head of Security
at Harrods, said:

“Compared with the protection that Al Fayed affords himself, which is very professional, of a very high standard, that
which was afforded to the mother of the future King of England was a Mickey Mouse operation.”

He added that “Al Fayed was absolutely paranoid about his personal protection”. Just for him to walk around his own
store, there would be three or four plain clothes members of his personal protection team who travelled with him all
the time, plus another four uniformed security who would act almost as ‘outriders’ to create two rings of security
around him. That’s in his own store! But is it paranoia, or the knowledge of the seedy, cesspit, world of arms dealers
and Brotherhood fixers of many kinds, in which Al Fayed constantly operates?

People who think nothing of the mass murder of children, let alone the assassination of a wealthy ‘yes’ man like him.
Dodi Fayed was obsessed with his security for the same reason. A lot of this security was also inspired by the size of
Al Fayed’s ego, to be fair. Mostly he recruited his body guards from the SAS and the Parachute Regiment and used
the Brotherhood operation, Control Risks, to make recommendations. Tom Bower tells in his book about Al Fayed of
how armed guards at the Oxted estate hide behind bushes wearing full combat uniform and blacked out faces.

Whenever Al Fayed travelled in his Mercedes there was always a back up Range Rover carrying emergency medical
equipment and security staff, but now he withdrew that protection from Diana. More than that, a new car was
introduced for her, another Mercedes was sent to the rear entrance of the Ritz, supplied by a car hire company called
Etoile Limousines, the same name as Dodi’s flat. Etoile Limousines is based at the Ritz and depends for its entire
income on contracts with the hotel and its guests. In other words, it is controlled completely by Mohamed Al Fayed
and whoever controls him. The new Mercedes was an S-280, lighter in weight than the 600 series they had used all
day and without the dark tinted windows. Other cars were available, but this one was chosen instead.

A director of Etoile, Niels Siegel, told the inquiry into Diana’s death that he delivered the car to the rear entrance of
the Ritz, but the Dispatches programme showed that this is a lie. It was delivered by a driver called Frederic Lucard
and he can be seen doing so on the security video. Lucard said he found it very strange that Etoile would allow Henri
Paul, a man not qualified as a chauffeur, to drive one of their cars. So why did they do it? Because Mohamed Al
Fayed told them to, that’s why. Brian Dodd, the former Head of Security for Al Fayed in the 1980s, gave his
assessment of the situation to Dispatches:

“It’s a new car that’s come into the system. "

They wouldn’t have had time to check that car out. It should have been checked out. There could have been a bomb
on the car, for instance. It was a most stupid plan. It shouldn’t even have been considered. The back up vehicle is
there, not just to avert the paparazzi, but for instance, a motor cyclist with a pillion rider to pull up and shoot, or put a
magnetised bomb on top of the car. That’s why the back up car is there - to stop any of that. Why they never had a
back up car, God only knows. (I think I can offer a good guess without the need for Divine inspiration.)

“I had probably six or eight men I would consider professional bodyguards who I would have had on that job and
Trevor Rees-Jones and Kes Wingfield, after what I have seen happened, would not have been in Paris that night.”

The Mercedes with Henry Paul at the wheel sped off from the rear entrance of the Ritz at 12.20am with Paul telling the
paparazzi not to bother following because they would never catch him. Diana and Dodi were in the back seat and in
the front was Trevor Rees-Jones, the former ‘Para’ with the reputation for being ‘fearless’. Rees-Jones says he
disagreed with the change of plan. He was not wearing a seat belt which is normal practice because body guards
need to be free to react quickly. The car was driven at speed down the Rue Cambon and turned right down the Rue
de Rivoli into the Place de la Concorde where it stopped briefly at the lights.

The paparazzi photographer, Romuald Rat, on the back of a motor cycle, drew up alongside them here, but he says
that Henri Paul jumped the lights on red and headed onto the dual carriageway alongside the River Seine called the
Cours la Reine. The car plunged down into one tunnel, came back to the surface, and almost immediately went down
into the very short tunnel at the Pont de UAlma. Here it went out of control and struck the 13th pillar in the centre of
the tunnel which is lined with concrete pillars unprotected by crash barriers.

Henri Paul and Dodi Fayed died immediately. According to the autopsy report Diana was clinically dead within 20
minutes and this was long before she arrived at hospital. Trevor Rees-Jones survived the crash because he was
wearing a seat belt and Diana and Dodi were not. This could be highly significant. Rees-Jones was not wearing a belt
when they left the Ritz in accordance with normal practice for body guards, and when Romuald Rat took a photograph
at the lights at the Place de la Concorde, Rees-Jones still did not have a seat belt on. But little more than a minute
later when the car struck the pillar, he was wearing a seat belt. Why? If he donned the belt because for some reason
he sensed danger, why did he not scream at Diana and Dodi to put their seat belts on?

After all it only takes a second and the whole reason he was in the car was to protect them. Rees-Jones has some
serious questions to answer here and he is giving no answers. Some bodyguards do put a seat belt on when the car
is on a fast road, but Rees-Jones is not saying this. He says he doesn’t know why he strapped himself in. And if they
were going to Dodi’s flat, they would have been on the fast road for about a minute. All he says is that he remembers
they were followed by two cars, one of them white, and a motorcycle, which is in keeping with the smokescreen story.
But one simple fact about the crash has been missed by all the newspaper articles, magazine features, television
documentaries and discussions I have seen, and by all but a few researchers.

Everyone is agreed that the couple were being driven back to Dodi’s flat near the Arc de Triomphe when the crash
happened. Well there is one glaring problem with that: The Pont de L’Alma tunnel is not on the way to Dodi’s flat.

It takes you away from that area.

I have been to Paris and walked the route the car took that night, in fact I have walked extensively around that whole
area, and the route to Dodi’s apartment is the same as the one they took earlier that night. You go to the Place de la
Concorde and, half way around, you turn right into the Champs Elysees and drive straight up to Dodi’s flat on the
right near the Arc de Triomphe  It would take only a few minutes. But Henri Paul did not do that.

He drove past the turning for the Champs Elysees, jumped the lights on red and sped down the duel carriageway to
the Pont de L’Alma. This took them AWAY from Dodi’s flat. I have heard it said that Paul was going a long way round
to avoid the photographers and traffic, but the photographers would have been waiting at the flat anyway by the time
they got there. What is most important to stress here is that Henri Paul’s route was not the direct one to Dodi’s
apartment, but it did ensure that it took them through the Pont de UAlma Tunnel, the significance of which is fantastic,
as you will soon appreciate.

Interestingly, it was after Paul went past the turning to Les Champs Elysees and headed towards the Pont de L’Alma
that Rees-Jones put his seat belt on. He says he can’t remember why, but I can help him there. There can only be two
reasons for this. Either he knew what was coming or he realised when Henri Paul screamed off from the lights that
something was seriously wrong and he put the seat belt on to protect himself. But again if that is the case, why did he
not tell Dodi and Diana to do the same? And if Rees-Jones had realised a potential danger, why had Dodi and Diana
not seen it and taken the appropriate action to protect themselves? I’m sorry if that upsets Rees-Jones’ family, but
given the circumstances these are questions that need to be asked.

Once the deed was done; the scapegoat was produced. The methods are so predictable, but they keep working so
why change them? The Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan and James Earl Ray of the Diana assassination was the
driver, Henri Paul. Once the paparazzi card had been played and focused public and media attention in the days after
the crash, it was announced that Paul was three to four times over the French drink driving limit and that his blood
contained traces of antidepressant drugs, including Fluoxetine, the active ingredient of the infamous Prozac. “The
cause of the crash was simple,” we were told. “The driver was drunk.”

Tampering with blood samples or creating alcohol in the blood is child’s play and so is the insertion of tiny ‘balloons’
which release alcohol into the blood stream in stages. There was certainly no sign before he drove away from the Ritz
that he was intoxicated to the extent, according to his blood tests, that he must have drunk the equivalent of eight
Scotches on an empty stomach. A behavioural psychologist on the Independent Television documentary, Diana -
Secrets Of The Crash, could find no evidence that he was drunk after studying the Ritz videos of him that night, but
there could be an explanation for this which I will come to shortly.

Only two days earlier, Paul had undergone a rigorous medical for the renewal of his pilot’s licence and there was no
sign of the alcohol abuse the post-crash propaganda claimed. Quite the opposite. And there was another strange
anomaly revealed by the ITV documentary in 1998. The Haemoglobin in Henri Paul’s blood was found to contain
20.7% carbon monoxide and this would have been at a much higher level earlier because the carbon monoxide
content halves every four to five hours once exposure to it has stopped. Haemoglobin carries the oxygen.

Debbie Davis of the Carbon Monoxide Support Group said that with these levels in his blood, Henri Paul would not
have known his left hand from his right, because of the reduced oxygen reaching the brain. Dr Alastair Hay, an expert
on carbon monoxide poisoning, agreed and could not explain why Paul showed no signs of the considerable
symptoms that should have been evident:

“I find it difficult to rationalize everything. A blood-carbon monoxide level of 20% and (a high blood-alcohol level)
suggests this would be someone with a much slower reaction time, certainly be someone who would be slowed up in
the way he did things, would probably also be somebody who was in some pain, but none of those things appear to
be evident from the pictures that we see of him. It is a bit of an enigma.”

There is a lot more to know about Henri Paul. His best friend, Claude Garrec, told the ITV documentary that Paul had
contacts within the French and foreign intelligence services and maintained them throughout his time at the Ritz. This
is no surprise because the intelligence agencies recruit the security men at the top hotels and the Ritz, with its VIP
clientele and reputation for espionage and arms dealing, would have been a prime target. Paul certainly had
unexplained sources of income.

He earned about £2025,000 a year at the Ritz and yet he was a keen pilot with 605 hours of flying time at about £300
an hour. He had a string of bank accounts. There were two in a bank outside Paris and three accounts, plus a safe
deposit box, at the Banque Nationale de Paris near the Ritz. He had three accounts at the nearby branch of Barclays
and one current and four deposit accounts at the Caisse D’Epargne de Paris. In the eight months before the crash,
sums of £4,000 were paid into an account here on five separate occasions. In total he had £122,000 (1.2 million
francs) and no-one knows where it came from. Then there is the question of where Paul was in the three hours
between 7pm when he went off duty and 10pm when Dodi called him on his mobile phone and told him to return to the
Ritz. His whereabouts in this period are a mystery. A very significant one.

To understand how the Brotherhood operates requires immensely detailed research over a vast array of
interconnecting subjects. Everything from ancient history, to Satanic symbolism and ritual, the Earth’s magnetic grid,
the power of the Sun, the banking system, and mind control. The journalists who have produced the articles and
documentaries about the crash came to the subject cold and they can never uncover the truth because they don’t
understand what they are dealing with.

Their vision of possibility is limited by their indoctrinated view of reality. They can’t see, for instance, that there are
organisations within organisations which means that one force can work through apparently unconnected agencies
like British and French Intelligence, the Paris police and medical services, and the inquiry investigating the cause of
the crash. I mean, you don’t have to search far for evidence of that.

One of the most important subjects to research if we are to understand how Diana was killed, is the power and
potential of mind control.

I’ll give some examples. In the 1980s the best part of 30 scientists working in top secret projects, mostly computer
programmers, died in very strange and unexplained circumstances. Marconi was the major company involved, but
there were others like Plessey and British Aerospace.

In 1986, Vimal Dajibhai, who was working for Marconi Underwater Systems, drove from London to Bristol, a city with
which he had no connection, and threw himself off the famous suspension bridge there. A few months before, Arshad
Sharif, a computer programmer with Marconi Defence Systems, also drove from London to Bristol and hanged
himself. Why Bristol? It is a former Knights Templar port and its name has evolved from Barati, the Phoenician
goddess. It just so happens that an elite unit of British Intelligence called the Committee of 26 is based there and they
use the runway at the British Aerospace complex to fly British and foreign agents in and out of the country.

I was called once, from what sounded like a plane, by a guy claiming to represent the CIA. He said he was flying into
the British Aerospace runway to sort me out. “The Company (CIA) are not happy,” he said. Oh, I thought, I am sorry, I
do hope they cheer up soon. I drove over to meet him just to check it out, but he didn’t show. He was probably a guy
who needed help, or perhaps they were seeing how I would react to threats. Either way, they got the airport right. In
that period in the 1980s, not only in Bristol, there were strange deaths galore of people at the cutting edge of
development in the ‘defence’ industries.

What possesses a man to get into his car, drive more than two hours to the Bristol Suspension Bridge, and jump off?
This may seem a long way from the Diana assassination, but it’s not. I’m talking about mind control. A CIA scientist
told me that he was put through forms of mind control to stop him recalling his knowledge once a project was
completed. I’ll give you an example of mind control in a situation very similar to the one in Paris.

David Sands was a highly skilled scientist working in a very sensitive area of defence, but at 37 he was talking about
leaving the industry and changing his lifestyle. He was happily married with two small children, a son aged six and a
three year old daughter. Sands and his wife had just returned from an enjoyable holiday in Venice when he died in
mysterious circumstances. Although they are not so mysterious if you understand mind control. He worked for
Easams who, in turn, were operating contracts for the Ministry of Defence. It appears that while Sands and his wife
were in Venice, the company was visited by members of the elite British police unit, the Special Branch.

Then, on Saturday, March 28th 1987, David Sands told his wife he was going out to refuel the car, but he didn’t
return for six hours. No-one has any idea where he was, but I think I do. His wife, Anna, called the police and
constable John Hiscock was at the house when Sands returned at 10.2Opm. Asked the obvious question:

“Where have you been?”, he said that he had been driving and thinking.

His wife said that it was out of character for him to be away for so long and she didn’t think he realised how long he
had been out. He seemed confused, but happy, she said. Two days later, on Monday, March 30th, he climbed into his
excellently maintained Austin Maestro and began his regular journey from his home in Itchen Abbas, near Winchester,
to Easams at Camberley in Surrey. His wife said there was nothing unusual about his demeanour or behaviour and
driving conditions were good.

But about 30 minutes into the journey when David Sands was driving along the A33 at Popham, near Basingstoke, he
suddenly did a U-turn across the duel carriageway and headed at high speed in the opposite direction to his
destination. Turning onto a slip road at about 80 miles an hour, Sands then drove his car straight into a disused cafe
building killing himself in an explosion of flame. There were no skid marks. He had not even tried to stop.

It is so clear that during the time he was missing, his mind was being programmed and all it took was a trigger word,
sign, sound or action, and the programming was activated. At that point he would have switched from his normal self
to a man focused only on driving into the cafe building and blowing himself away. The subconscious programming
overpowers the conscious mind and robot replaces human.

That, I am convinced, is what also happened to Henri Paul in Paris. Sands went missing for six hours before he drove
into the cafe. Paul went missing for three hours before he drove into the 13th pillar in the Pont de UAlma tunnel. This
is what I suggest happened in Paris. The Brotherhood networks were working through many people and agencies to
ensure that Diana was in Paris that night because, at its foundation, the plan was to perform a specific Satanic ritual
and the timing, circumstances and the place of death had to be arranged in intricate detail.

Diana was under Al Fayed’s security web for much of the time leading up to the crash and all of the time in those last
few days. Her conversations were heard and monitored throughout by the Al Fayed bugging system. During his
missing hours, Henri Paul, the asset of French and British Intelligence, was being programmed for his role, or perhaps
the final touches were being put to programming already installed. Diana’s ritual death was arranged from the very
top of the Brotherhood and, by comparison, people like Al Fayed are small and powerless nonentities, pawns in the
game they probably do not fully understand.

The Mercedes which was brought to the rear entrance of the Ritz had been stolen some weeks earlier - before the
Diana-Dodi relationship began - and when it was recovered it underwent extensive repairs. It had been standing
outside the exclusive Taillevent restaurant when the driver’s door was flung open and the chauffeur pulled out by
three Arabic-speaking men with hand guns. The vehicle was missing for two weeks and when it was found the wheels
were missing, the door ripped off, and the electronic system and equipment controlling the braking system had gone.
Al Fayed, as we have seen, controlled the company, Etoile Limousines, which supplied the vehicle. No wonder the
French authorities turned down the offer by experts from Mercedes to examine the car after the crash.

When Henri Paul came back on duty that night he seemed his normal self to most observers. The programming was
deep within his psyche still waiting to be activated. He may well have had a couple of alcoholic drinks in the Ritz bar,
but his intake and demeanour did not correspond with the later medical report. Claims that he was an alcoholic also
do not match with the examination of his liver.

But if, as I suggest, Henri Paul was a mind controlled ‘multiple’ he could have been drunk in one compartment of his
mind and not in another. I have heard from recovering ‘multiples’ who have experienced this. Someone close to Paul
that night, his handler, was switching his compartments. In this way he could have had a considerable level of alcohol
in his blood while, in some compartments, he would have been unaffected by it. The same with the carbon monoxide.
Just before or just after the Mercedes pulled away from the Ritz, Henri Paul was given the trigger which activated the
programming. It could have been a sound, a sign, a colour or more likely a word or sentence.

With Paul’s subconscious programming now overwhelming his conscious mind, he sped away to the Place de la
Concorde and down the dual carriageway to the Pont de UAlma. Rees-Jones put his seat belt on, but apparently did
not alert Diana and Dodi to the danger. Thus they stay unbelted. As Paul entered the Pont d L’Alma tunnel at an
estimated 80 miles an hour (some reports say slower), he braked fiercely, scraped the right hand wall of the tunnel,
and then aimed the car at the 13th pillar. It is the 13th pillar that gives it away.

The Brotherhood throughout history has had such an obsession with the number 13 that to believe this was a
coincidence is taking chance to the level of fantasy. There must be 30 pillars in that tunnel and the car hit the 13th
because it was meant to. Diana had an aversion to the number 13 and she would not allow a 13th lot in her dress
auction at Christies the June before she died. If, as some witnesses have suggested, the crash was caused by the
Mercedes hitting a white Fiat Uno or by a motorcyclist flashing a powerful light into Paul’s eyes from a motor cycle,
there is no way he could be sure of hitting the 13th pillar.

But a person with a deeply programmed subconscious would be able to put the car right on the button, even at speed.

Mark Phillips is the man who helped to de-programme Cathy O’Brien when she was a mind controlled slave of the CIA.
He has worked in these fields for much of his adult life and after I reached my conclusions about the events in Paris, I
rang him to ask if it would be possible to mind control Henri Paul to pick out that pillar at speed. Mark was in no doubt:
“Yes, Yes” he said “More than yes, absolutely yes”.

He pointed out that the subconscious worked much faster than the conscious mind and to the subconscious 80 miles
an hour would actually be quite slow compared with its ability to think and react. If the speed was considerably slower
as some reports suggest, it would have been even easier.

“There are many techniques they could have used to programme his mind during those three hours he was missing”,
Mark said.

The number of ways they could have caused the crash, another vehicle, an explosive device, stun weapons, etc, etc,
would fill a book and any of them is possible on the face of it. But not if they wanted to be sure of hitting the 13th
pillar, which they did. To do that, they needed a driver with a programmed subconscious.

I think the stories about the mysterious Fiat Uno and the motorcyclist with the flashing light are diversions to lead
researchers away from the simple truth. So much time and effort has been wasted on the Fiat in particular, fueled by
Al Fayed’s own investigation team. Whenever such assassinations are staged, there are always a stream of false
‘clues’ and ‘leads’ which divert attention. The Kennedy assassination was full of them.

Another possibility for the cause of the crash is external control of the car. Randulph Fiennes, famous for his polar
expeditions, was an officer in the Royal Scots Greys and attached to the elite SAS. He wrote a book about a secret
group of assassins called the Clinic and how they murdered people while making it look like an accident. The death of
Major Michael Marman is particularly relevant to what could have happened in Paris. He was driving a Citroen 2CV
along the A303 near Stonehenge in November 1986 when a BMW coming the other way careered across the
carriageway and killed him instantly.

Fiennes says that the BMW had been tampered with and the braking system was operated by remote control which
could override the normal system via compressed air from a tiny scuba diving cylinder hidden in the engine
compartment. The remote control equipment was operated from a Volvo which followed the BMW, Fiennes reported.
The BMW was driven by Sir Peter Horsley, a retired Air Marshall, who survived the crash.

Fiennes says that the Clinic knew that Horsley would be travelling along that road at the same time as their target. In
his autobiography, Sounds From Another Room, Horsley says that he was accelerating to about 60 miles an hour
when the car began to react strangely. He saw a grey Volvo closing up quickly behind him and as he was about to
wave it past, his BMW spun sharply to the left, the brakes screeching, and then sharply to the right and back again.
This is remarkably similar to what happened to the Mercedes before it struck the 13th pillar.

Horsley was by now desperately trying to maintain control and he went on:

“Out of the corner of my eye I saw the grey Volvo accelerating past me at high speed. My car had now developed a
mind of its own as it swung broadside and skidded down the road. With a lurch it hit the central reservation, mounted
the grass verge separating the two lanes of the highway and crossed over into the opposite carriageway. I had just
time to see a small car approaching from the opposite direction. I hit it sideways on with tremendous force. In a split-
second the driver’s horror-stricken face was visible and I heard his hoarse scream.”

It is possible that Diana’s Mercedes was externally controlled in this way, because it is clear that the steering on
Horsley’s BMW was also remotely controlled. Certainly a highly skilled operator could direct the Mercedes into the
13th pillar. Support for the contention that no other car was directly involved in Diana’s crash comes from Eric Petel
who claims to have seen the crash. Petel says that he was riding his motorcycle towards the entrance to the tunnel
when he was overtaken by the Mercedes. No other vehicle was nearby. He said:

“I saw a car in my rear-view mirrors flashing its headlamps. I moved across to let it by and it raced past even though I
was doing about 70 miles per hour. An instant later I heard a deafening noise and saw the accident. The car was
spinning in the road... I stopped. There were no other cars or bikes around at all and I could see all the way through
the tunnel.

The roof of the Mercedes was totally smashed in. The right hand rear door was partly open and I looked in and saw a
woman. She seemed to have been thrown forward from the back seat and had her head between the front seats.”

Petel said blood was flowing from her right ear and as he brushed her hair from her face and placed her head on the
arm rest, he realized it was Princess Diana. Her eyelashes were fluttering, but she had not opened her eyes at this
stage, he said. Petel estimates he was at the scene for about a minute before climbing back on his bike to ring the
police. He told them that Diana had been in an accident, but they laughed and told him to stop wasting their time. In
despair at this, he rode to the police station in Avenue Mozart.

His lawyer, Antoine Deguines, says that Petel was kept waiting for 25 minutes and taken into a back room where he
was handcuffed. For reporting an ‘accident’? When eventually freed, he was told to follow a police car to another
police station where he gave a statement which he signed without reading. “I was outraged” he said “They didn’t seem
to care about the crash.” He heard nothing from the authorities for months before he enlisted help from a lawyer to
tell his story to the official inquiry.

Whenever an assassination occurs in a public place, two things happen. The person named as responsible is a
‘patsy’ or ‘scapegoat’, most often these days under mind control, and diversions galore are created to lead
investigators away from the truth of what happened. The first method allows you to make an immediate arrest, or
expose the person to blame, and no further investigations are necessary because everyone knows who was
responsible. We have seen this technique with Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, Timothy McVeigh, and now Henri
Paul. It is endless.

The second method, the diversion, ensures that the crucial hours and days after the event are wasted as people
chase a mass of false stories and ‘leads’.This was a technique used in Paris with the paparazzi, the flashing lights
from motorcycles and later the Fiat Uno. Also when people are fed a constant barrage of conflicting reports and
theories they become confused and a confused mind switches off and loses interest. So first they tell you the
paparazzi were to blame, then they were not. Then they tell you the car speedometer was found stuck at 120 miles an
hour, then they say it was found on zero.

I thought it strange how many American witnesses to the crash were quickly located.

The Pont and Place de L’Alma were not, before Diana’s death, a popular tourist area.

There is nothing there except a restaurant or two, a tunnel, and a maze of crossing roads. And yet at 12.25 in the
morning, several American tourists say they witnessed what happened. The number of witnesses in general was
unusual anyway, given the late hour and the fact that Paris empties at that time of year as vast numbers of Parisians
take their annual holiday to the French coastal resorts.

I can understand that some people in the few cars travelling along the road at the time may have seen the crash and
its immediate aftermath, but I know from visiting the spot myself, that the main pedestrian routes have virtually no view
of the tunnel at all. The police failed to control the crash scene according to normal police procedure and so much
evidence was lost immediately. They failed to question important witnesses and leaked some information while
maintaining unshakable secrecy over other areas of the investigation. It all stinks.

Today there is an added challenge for would-be assassins and assassination plots with the ‘traffic’ cameras that are
located all over cities. Smile, you’re on TV. It would be impossible to keep secret the methods and personnel used to
kill Diana if the whole thing was being videoed. But when you are the Brotherhood with connections at the highest
levels in politics, police and intelligence agencies, the traffic cameras present no such problem. You simply switch
them off!

There are 17 traffic cameras on the route between the Ritz and the Pont de L’Alma, including those inside the tunnel
itself. If they had been working that night there would be no mystery, because you could play back the whole event on
your television set. One camera looks down on the entrance to the tunnel and would have recorded any Fiat Uno or
men on motorbikes with flashing lights. But that camera, like all the others, was switched off at the crucial moment.
Never before in Paris had the whole system malfunctioned at the same time and the police refuse to explain what
happened. The system runs on an independent power supply and it is controlled by the police and, ultimately, by the
French Intelligence agencies, because the cameras are there to monitor far more than just traffic problems.

At the same time as the camera system failed all the police communication frequencies in central Paris also went off.
Simon Reagan in his excellent book, Who Killed Diana?, quotes a contact called Andre’ who, like many people, loves
to listen in to police radio messages. Andre’ was sitting on a bench near the Eiffel Tower, a few minutes walk from the
Pont de L’Alma, on the night Diana died. He was, as usual, using a receiver to monitor the police communications.

But suddenly, at 12.2Oam, all the lines went down. There was a radio blackout. It lasted for 20 minutes and then,
Andre’ said, the signal came back and there was a mass of radio traffic as people all wanted to talk at once. “I have
never... come across such chaotic radio traffic”, he said. “It was extraordinary.”

When the lines went down Diana was leaving the Ritz on her last journey alive. By the time they came back she was
lying in the tunnel under the complete control of the emergency team and according to the autopsy report within a few
minutes of clinical death. And there is not a shred of credible evidence for a conspiracy, is there, eh? My God, it’s in
our face. But within ten days of the crash, the French police had produced a 350 page preliminary report which
assumed it was an accident and they did not consider any other possibility.

Now, talking of that ‘emergency team’ brings me to another vital point. As a contact on the fringes of British
Intelligence told me, causing the crash is easy for the powers involved, but you cannot be sure of killing your target.
Therefore you have your people controlling the medical team because, although your target hasn’t died, there is now
a credible reason for them to die. There has been a crash. The medical team’s job (or those in charge, anyway) is to
make sure that the target does not survive, no matter what condition they may be in to start with.

Even those who dismiss the idea that Diana was murdered have questioned the astonishing delay in getting her to
hospital when, according to the official medical reports, she was suffering from an injury that required urgent surgery.
The doctors say that the pulmonary vein had been ruptured near the heart and this was filling her lungs with blood.
Diana was lying in the tunnel bleeding to death, if that is correct. The only way her life was going to be saved with
such an injury was through immediate surgery.

So why was it more than an hour and a half before she arrived at the hospital? Within a minute of impact, Doctor
Frederic Mailliez with an American ‘friend’ Mark Butt, drove into the tunnel from the opposite direction. A private
investigator I know has made extensive inquiries into Mailliez and Butt and, while these investigations continue, his
findings strongly suggest there is more to both of them than we are being told. The crash happened at 12.25am and
by 12.26, Doctor Mailliez said he had seen the crushed Mercedes, stopped his car, turned on warning lights, run
across to the Mercedes to establish there were two people dead and two alive and had rung the emergency services.

This man must be a seriously quick worker. He is one of 160 Parisian doctors who are on constant call for
emergencies in hospitals and private homes as part of a French insurance system, SOS Medecins. He had treated
accident victims many times when he was a member of SAMU, the French emergency ambulance service. And yet a
doctor on constant call for emergencies says that all he had in his car to help Diana was an oxygen cylinder and
mask! Mailliez was in control of Diana and her condition for the crucial 15 to 20 minutes before his former employers,
the SAMU emergency team, arrived to take over.

He claims that Diana did not say anything to him, but this contradicts his comment to the London Times that,

“She kept saying how much she hurt as I put a resuscitation mask over her mouth”.

Trevor Rees-Jones, the bodyguard, also says he had flashbacks of hearing a female voice calling out in the back of
the car:  “First it’s a groan. Then Dodi’s name was called... And that can only be Princess Diana’s voice” he told the
Daily Mirror.

How reliable that statement is, however, is open to debate. What does seem to be clear is that Diana was conscious
or at least semi-conscious when Mailliez arrived.

He told the CNN chat show host, Larry King, that:

“She looked pretty fine. At the beginning... from the outside, you know, she looked pretty fine. But inside, you know,
the internal injury was already starting... It’s really funny. That’s the only part, where she was sitting, that’s the only
part which was still intact.”

Mailliez on one hand told a French medical magazine that: “I thought her life could be saved” and yet said another
time that “It was hopeless.

"There was nothing we could do to save her.” He also told King that although Diana is the most photographed woman
in the world, and the paparazzi were taking shots of her while he was with her in the tunnel, he had no idea that she
was Princess Diana until he saw the news reports the following morning. Excuse me? The pigs are airborne again.
When the emergency team arrived, Malliez says he left the scene because there was nothing more he could do.

The official explanation for the incredible delay in taking Diana to hospital is that she was trapped in the wreckage.
This is a lie, lie, lie. One of the ambulance crew told the French newspaper, La Parisien, that when he arrived Diana
was lying with most of her body out of the car with her legs resting on the rear seat. “She was agitated, semi knocked
out, but conscious... she was groaning and struggling feebly. She murmured ‘Oh my God’ several times.”

The Scotsman newspaper, in an investigation published on September 11th 1997, established that Diana was
removed from the car shortly after the fire brigade arrived and the excuse of her being ‘trapped’ does not stand up.
Another official excuse for the delay is that the emergency doctors had to give her a blood transfusion. This is
another lie, lie, lie. SAMU teams do not carry blood transfusion equipment because they would not know the victim’s
blood type.

When the ambulance did leave the tunnel, the driver was ordered to go no faster than 25 miles an hour and some
reports say it took as long as 40 minutes to cover the 3.7 miles (6km) to the La Pitie-Salpetriere. Four other hospitals
quite capable of treating Diana were closer to the scene and the ambulance stopped twice on the way for ‘delicate
interventions’, one of them within sight of the hospital. Diana arrived at La Pitie-Salpetriere about 2.lOam, an hour
and 45 minutes after the crash happened.

By any medical criteria whatsoever this delay was utterly ludicrous, unless it was meant to happen. It doesn’t take a
genius to see why, despite such apparent incompetence, there has been no inquiry into the medical response that
night. Waiting at the hospital were a surgical team headed by Professor Bruno Riou, the duty surgeon who, we are
told, first heard about the crash while doing his rounds. Is it only me that finds it strange that a renowned surgeon is
‘doing his rounds’ in the early hours of the morning?

Waiting with him when Diana arrived were Professor Pierre Coriat, the head of anaesthetics, Professor Alain Pavie, a
chest and heart specialist, and Professor Pierre Benazet, another experienced surgeon. They had been in telephone
communication with the emergency team in the tunnel throughout. We are told they opened Diana’s chest cavity,
repaired the vein, and ‘battled to save her’ for an hour and a half before admitting defeat. I find this remarkable, also,
because the autopsy report apparently shows that Diana was clinically dead at 12.45 am while still lying in the tunnel.

She would therefore have been clinically dead for an hour and 25 minutes before she even arrived at the hospital
and for three hours before the professors walked out of the operating theatre to announce that she had died. Having
the body examined at a location you control is vital in such assassinations. President Kennedy’s body was flown
immediately out of Dallas to the Brotherhood-front, the Bethesda Naval Center near Washington DC, for the post
mortem. Here the president’s brain went missing (or his look-alike’s did) and, as the US Assassination Records
Review Board revealed, the autopsy notes and the first draft of the post mortem were burned.

So who was behind Diana’s assassination? It is important to stress that those who gave the order and those who did
the deed would be very different. We are looking at a Brotherhood here, a spider’s web, and while the order will have
come from the spider or spiders in the centre, it will have been mostly carried out by the flies. It is highly unlikely that it
would have been done directly by British Intelligence because that would be too obvious.

Intelligence agencies subcontract the assassinations of their own citizens to put them at arms length from the incident
and to allow them to ‘plausibly deny’ that they were responsible. For instance, there is considerable evidence that
President Kennedy was shot by members of an elite rifle team within a renegade unit of French Intelligence called the
OAS, or at least that they were involved in the plot. Olof Palme, the Bilderberger Prime Minister of Sweden, was
murdered in Stockholm in 1986 on the orders of, among others, George Bush. But the killing was carried out by
members of BOSS, the South African Intelligence agency (see .. And The Truth Shall Set You Free).

The British Foreign Office has its own assassination squad called Group 13 (that number again) and British
Intelligence has a long and sick history of political and economic assassinations. British Intelligence consists of MIS
(Military Intelligence 5) which is responsible officially for domestic security, and M16 which deals with overseas
matters. MIS announced in 1988 that they do not assassinate people. No, they get others to do it for them.

This pathetic denial was prompted by the revelations of the former MIS agent, David Shayler, that M16 had organised
a plot to assassinate Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi. The attempt had failed because the bomb was put under the wrong
car. Shayler was head of the ‘Libyan Desk’ at MIS and was in the perfect position to know. Robin Cook, the Foreign
Secretary, who is so far out of his depth he needs a frogman’s suit, said that he had been assured that no such event
took place.

Oh, that’s OK then. The attorney-general banned David Shayler from appearing on the ITV programme, Diana -
Secrets of the Crash, and later Shayler was arrested and jailed in Paris awaiting extradition to London. Why do that if
what he is saying is such nonsense? Because, of course, he’s right. By the way, the oath of allegiance by British
Intelligence officers is not to the government, but to the monarch. It is the same with Members of Parliament and the
military. Ultimately the Queen is their boss under the law, although, in truth, their boss is whoever controls the Queen
because even she is not at the top of the pile.

The type of organisation most likely to have been involved in Diana’s death, at the operational level is typified by the
Pinay Circle or ‘Le Cercle’ which has a number of British establishment figures in its ranks. Le Cercle is an offshoot of
the even more elite Safari Club, which was set up by Count Alexander de Maranches, the Director during the 1970s of
the French Service for External Documentation and Espionage.

It was the Safari Club which arranged for the alliance between a French Intelligence front-company called Group Bull
and the computer giant Honeywell which is, you will be surprised to know, the world’s biggest manufacturer of land
mines. This alliance supplied land mines to both sides in the Bosnian conflict. The Safari Club began as a consortium
of the secret police of the Shah of Iran called SAVAK, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Saudi
Arabian Intelligence. It has been involved in countless coups in Africa to further its goals and is heavily involved in
arms trading and supply.

Out of the Safari Club came the Pinay Circle or Le Cercle, named after the French Prime Minister, Antoine Pinay, who
attended the first Bilderberg Meeting in Oosterbeek, Holland, in May 1954. Others involved with Le Cercle included
the Habsburg family. To give you an idea of its make up and range of influence, the Le Cercle membership has
included Nicholas Elliot, a department head at M16; William Colby, a former director of the CIA; Colonel Botta of Swiss
Military Intelligence; Stefano Della Chiaie, a leading member of the Italian Secret Service; Giullo Andreotti, the former
Italian Prime Minister from the notorious P2 Freemasonry Lodge and the man who gave the Mafia official protection;
Silva Munoz, a former minister for the fascist, Franco, in Spain and a member of the Elite secret society, Opus Dei;
Franz Josef Strauss, the German defence minister; and Monsignor Brunello, an agent to the Vatican.

In America, one of the Le Cercle fronts is the CIA-backed Heritage Foundation in Washington. Look at the potential
for such an organisation to be the coordinating force between countless different agencies and countries all to
achieve a common aim. The Safari Club-Le Cercle network provides the Arab-British-French connection necessary to
arrange for Diana to be in Paris at the right time, the security for her to be withdrawn, the assassination to be carried
out, and those involved to get away with it.

What was that John Stalker said? “Why would the French want to cover up the murder of a British woman?” It is also
interesting that Simon Regan in his book, Who Killed Diana?, says that it was Le Cercle which destabilized the Gough
Whitlam government in Australia in 1975. The Queen was certainly involved in that, too. As I explained earlier, it was
her Governor of Australia, John Kerr, who removed Whitlam in the end. If the Windsors and Le Cercle worked
together to bring down an elected Australian Government, why could they not have worked together to eliminate

Paris, with its immense Brotherhood associations going back centuries, has long been a favourite location for their
murders and plots. Amschel Rothschild from the English branch of the family, was murdered there in his hotel room in
1996 in what some claim to have been part of one of the inter-Brotherhood wars which have littered their history.

For an organization like Le Cercle, or its many mirrors in London, it would have been easy to place its people in the
right places. Mohamed Al Fayed’s security operation is awash with former members of elite British military and police
units who know the consequences of saying “No” to the Brotherhood, even if they don’t wish to be involved. In the
same way, these spider structures ensure that their people control the inquiries into their assassinations, as they did
most famously with Kennedy. Even Mohamed Al Fayed’s personal investigation into Diana’s death was headed by
Pierre Ottavoili, a former chief of the Criminal Brigade, the criminal investigation department of French Police.

This is the same organization which is also responsible for the official investigation. Al Fayed’s chief lawyer in Paris is
a former French Justice Minister, and in overall charge in London is John Macnamara, his head of security and a
former Chief Superintendent at the headquarters of London’s Metropolitan Police, Scotland Yard. In the Spring of
1998, Macnamara was part of a ‘sting’ operation involving the FBI, CIA and possibly, the Israeli (Rothschild)
Intelligence Agency Mossad, to arrest a former CIA agent Oswald Le Winter, a 67-year-old American born in Austria.

Le Winter contacted Al Fayed claiming to have documents for sale proving the involvement of M16 and the CIA in
Diana’s murder. He was asking $10 million and after a meeting with Macnamara he was given an advance of $15,000.
A further meeting was arranged in Vienna, Austria, for the key documents and the rest of the money to be handed
over. In the meantime, however, Al Fayed called a friend in the FBI, who contacted the CIA.

Le Winter was followed, spied on, and lured to the Ambassador Hotel in Vienna on Wednesday April 22nd, where with
support from the Austrian police a combination of FBI, CIA and possibly Mossad agents pounced on him. All this for
an alleged hoaxer? The story would have remained secret, but for Peter Grolig, an Austrian journalist on the Kurier
newspaper. He reported what happened and established that when Le Winter’s hotel room was searched, four
documents, two of them in code, were found and appeared to be genuine CIA documents.

The CIA have since admitted tapping Diana’s phone calls in, and to, America and passing the contents to British
Intelligence. Le Winter was arrested and held in custody. Grolig’s story forced Al Fayed to admit that it was true. So
was Le Winter trapped by such an array of international security personnel because he was selling a hoax to Al
Fayed or because he was selling the truth? Another intelligence insider also insists the crash was not an accident.

Richard Tomlinson, a former agent of Britain’s M16, gave evidence to the French inquiry into Diana’s death. In 1997
Tomlinson served a six month jail sentence under the Official Secrets Act for trying to sell his memoirs. In August
1998 he was arrested again, at gun point, in Paris at the request of the British Government who were concerned at
his association in that city with the MIS whistle-blower, David Shayler, who was also arrested and jailed in Paris.

Tomlinson apparently told Herve Stephan, the judge in charge of the ‘inquiry’, that Diana was murdered. According to
a report on the BBC’s news service, Ceefax, on August 28th 1998, he told the judge that Henri Paul was an asset of
British Intelligence and so was “One of the bodyguards”. Which one was not named. Meanwhile Herve Stephan, a
Brotherhood placeman, is doing all he can to hold the line that it was an accident.

The most important question to ask when you are trying to identify those responsible for a crime is: “Who benefits?”
As the Roman writer, Seneca, said: “He who most benefits from a crime is the one most likely to have committed it”.
Well the Windsors benefited magnificently. No longer is Diana there to continue her inevitable destruction of the
Monarchy’s credibility and public esteem with her actions and her knowledge of their secrets. No longer is she there
to bring her influence on the upbringing and attitudes of the future king, Prince William and his brother Prince Harry.

The Windsors now have complete control of them, to mould them into their image. They couldn’t do that before
because Diana’s influence was too strong and I hope the memory of that will encourage the princes to withstand the
indoctrination. The way is now paved for Charles’ marriage to Camilla Parker-Bowles without the complication of
Diana and, of course, his royal duty to produce Windsor heirs with Spencer genes, although as we shall see, William
might not be his child. Understandably, it has been suggested that Diana was killed because of her campaign against
land mines. This is not true, not directly anyway.

The land mine manufacturers have done very nicely from her campaign, because they make far more money from
clearing mines than they do making them. A mine costs about £30 to produce, but at least £3,000 to clear. Clearing
all the mines around the world is estimated at £330 billion. No, the land mine manufacturers like Honeywell were not
against Diana’s campaign, they loved it for their own reasons. But what she showed very clearly was the power she
had to take an issue from the shadows and hurl it into the public arena. The question could well have been: “What will
she do next?”. And what was it that Diana had to reveal, as she told my contact, that would “Shake the world”?

Henry Kissinger, one of the greatest Brotherhood manipulators of the 20th century, met Diana a number of times and
sickeningly attended her funeral. He said in an interview after her death that:

“She was politically and diplomatically uncontrollable”. That is Kissinger-speak for “That’s one reason she was killed”.

From the perspective of the operational level of the Brotherhood pyramid, as with Kennedy, there were many reasons
why they wanted her dead. But, as I keep emphasizing, that is only one level. At the top are the Elite black magic
adepts, the reptilian full bloods and crossbreeds.

At the highest level of the Brotherhood, Diana’s death, like Kennedy’s, was a ritual killing. It was long planned for the
effect it would have on the people and the magnetic field of the Earth, and to symbolise the introduction of the New
World Order. Don’t underestimate the fantastic power of ritual and symbolism in affecting the human psyche and the
planet’s magnetic field. These people are not obsessed with it for no reason.

The Brotherhood and Satanic symbolism surrounding Diana’s death is endless and to understand the background to
her ritual murder we must, once again, go back a very long time. Diana was one of the greatest goddesses of the
ancient world and she represented the female energy also known as Barati, Britannia, Isis, Artemis, Aphrodite, all
these different names for the same energy. If you go back far enough, they symbolise the same entity, also,

                            Diana was known as a Moon goddess. One tribe of Elite bloodlines who worshipped
                            the goddess Diana were called the  Sicambrian Franks who can be traced from
                           Troy (that name again), through Asia Minor, now Turkey, the Caucasus Mountains
                           (again) and up into Europe. They lived at one time in an area west of the River Danube
                            and settled in Germania, named by the Romans after the Scythian ‘genuine ones’ with
                            their centre in Cologne.

They also invaded parts of Roman-occupied Gaul, the land which is now Belgium and northern France, from where
the ‘noble’ families of Scotland were to come. It is from these Sicambrian Franks that we get the name France. At the
time of King Meroveus, who was named Guardian of the Franks in 448, this people became known as the
Merovingians and Princess Diana, through the Stuart bloodline, was related to them. Many seem to believe that the
Merovingians are descended from the bloodline of Jesus, but how they can be genetically descended from a myth
defeats me. This is a diversion to mislead.

They are, however, an Elite bloodline that goes back to the Aryan race in the ancient Middle and Near East and
eventually goes off planet. The Merovingians were the sorcerer kings who were noted for their esoteric knowledge
and magical powers which they inherited from the underground bloodline streams of secret groups and initiations.
Francio, the founder of the Franks, claimed to be a descendant of Noah and his ancestors once resided in ancient
Troy of wooden horse fame.

The French city of Troyes, where the Templars were officially formed, was named by the Sicambrian Franks after
their former home. The Iliad says that Troy was founded by Dardanus, the son of the Greek god Zeus, who was
depicted as both an eagle and a serpent. Zeus was born in Arcadia in Sparta, it is said, and the Spartans migrated
into France. These are the bloodlines we are talking about here, not those of ‘Jesus’.

The city of Paris was established by the Sicambrian Franks in the 6th century after they became known as the
Merovingians. It was named after Prince Paris, the son of King Priam of Troy. It was the relationship between Prince
Paris and Helen of Sparta which supposedly caused the Trojan War in which the Trojan Horse (infiltration) assured
victory for the Spartans. Both the Trojans and the Spartans were branches of the same Aryan peoples and within
them were the reptilian bloodlines.

Paris in those days was confined to an island in the River Seine which is now known as the Ile de la Cite or Isle of the
City. The Notre Dame Cathedral, built by the Templars on a site of former Diana worship, stands on the Ile de la Cite
today and this is where the Templar Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, was roasted to death.

The Merovingians established the city of Paris on a major vortex point which is why the Notre Dame Cathedral is built
on that spot. Meroveus, the founder of the Merovingian dynasty, followed the goddess cult of Diana and this is not
surprising because the epicentre for Diana worship was at the famous temple at Ephesus in Asia Minor, not far from
the alleged site of Troy. The temple is named as one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. Diana was known
as Queen of Heaven, just like Semiramis.

Outside the original Paris - and now very much inside the modern city - the Merovingians established an underground
chamber for the worship of the goddess Diana and for the blood rituals and human sacrifices to her. This site dates
back at least to 500-750 AD and it was here that kings in dispute over property would settle the issue in combat.
According to legend, anyone killed there goes straight to Heaven and sits at the right hand of God. Now get this: The
location today of this underground sacrificial site for the goddess Diana is... the Pont de L’Alma tunnel!

The word pont relates to Pontifex, a Roman high priest, and it means passage or bridge. Alma comes from Al-Mah, a
Middle Eastern name for, wait for it... the Moon goddess. So the Pont de UAlma translates as ‘Bridge of the Moon
Goddess’ and the adjoining Place de L’Alma is the ‘Place of the Moon Goddess’. And the Moon goddess is Diana. It
can also translate as ‘Bridge of the Soul’ and a ‘Maiden’ of the goddess Diana was called an Al-mah! This is why
Henri Paul was programmed to drive past the turning to Dodi Fayed’s flat and head for the Pont de L’Alma tunnel.

This is why the emergency team kept her in the tunnel for so long instead of rushing her to hospital where her life
would have been saved. She wasn’t meant to be saved and they only moved her when she was clinically dead, as the
autopsy report confirmed. According to Brotherhood Satanic ritual, Diana had to die in that underground chamber on
the ancient sacrificial site and it had to happen at night under the Moon in the goddess month of August, ruled
according to legend by the Roman version of Isis, Diana, etc: Juno Augusta.

The Satanists in the emergency team simply ensured that Diana would not leave the tunnel (sacrificial chamber) alive.
We are told she bled to death and, if this is correct, it was precisely in accordance with their blood rites and sacrificial
rites. But was the bleeding caused in the way we are told, or by some other chemical means? We now know that
Diana was clinically dead about 12.45 am, yet she was taken to the La Pitie Salpetriere Hospital and kept in the
operating theatre for an hour and a half while the medical team, Professor Bruno Riou, Professor Pierre Coriat,
Professor Alain Pavie and Professor Jean Pierre Benazat, cut open her chest and “battled to save her”.

Save a woman who had already been clinically dead for an hour and fifteen minutes when she arrived at the hospital?
When they had finished, the French Minister of the Interior, Jean-Pierre Chevenement, decreed, according to his
senior advisor, Sami Mani, that there would be strictly no admittance to the room in which her body was laid out.
Chevenement was one of several ‘VIPs’ who rushed to the tunnel and observed the medical operation at this former
sacrificial site.

Another name for the goddess Diana is Hecate. One of the ancient ‘triads’ or ‘trinities’ was that of Diana, Luna and
Hecate who were said to be three aspects of the same female energy. It was called Diana on Earth, Luna in Heaven,
and Hecate in Hell.

Hecate is one of the premier deities of Satanism and she is a version of Aphrodite and Venus, different names for the
same energy. After her husband’s death, Jackie Kennedy travelled to the Greek island of Delos in the south west
Aegean Sea, the legendary birthplace of Diana and Apollo and the considered domain of Hecate, the goddess of the
‘infernal arts’. Delos is known for this reason as the Island of the Dead.

Hecate was portayed as both the virgin and the whore and crossroads are the sacred places of Diana-Hecate. It is at
crossroads that the witches and the Grand Masters and sorcerers of Freemasonry perform their rituals. Crossroads
are symbolic of the vortex points created where ley lines cross. In ritual sex magic, the wearing of clothes of the
opposite sex and the performance of bi-sexual acts are called ‘Crossroad Rites’.

The women involved were called ‘dikes’. Crossroads are also places of human and animal sacrifice and Hecate is
known as a ‘sex and death goddess’ and the goddess of witchcraft and sorcery. At the Pont de L’Alma, right at the
spot where Diana died, the road that goes through the tunnel is crossed on the surface by another road which leads
onto the Pont de L’Alma Bridge. In fact this spot is a maze of crossroads. And Diana died in the early morning of
August 31st. Hecate’s Day in the Satanic calendar is August 13th, but under the Satanic law of reverse symbolism
and reverse numbers, Hecate’s day of sacrifice is... August 31st!!

                                                                 Three Crescents-
                                                                  Hecate Crossroads)                  

So just look at the symbolism of this. Diana, named after the ancient Moon goddess, was driven from the Ritz and
through the Place de la Concorde where she passed the 3,200 year-old Egyptian obelisk brought to Paris from Luxor
with it’s tip or pyramid coloured bright gold symbolising the penis of Osiris.

It was at this very point, a minute from where Diana died, that Queen Marie Antoinette was beheaded at the guillotine
during the Brotherhood-engineered French Revolution, another symbolic blood sacrifice of the female energy. Diana
was then driven at speed to the Pont de UAlma tunnel, the Bridge or Place of the Moon Goddess, where the car
struck the 13th pillar, the symbolism for which is simply enormous for obvious reasons and for others I’ll come to later.

Now she was left to die on the very site of an ancient underground sacrificial chamber to the goddess Diana and bled
to death according to Satanic ritual. She also died at a crossroads with one road under the ground, the other above,
and the crossroads is the sacred place for the Satanic deity, Hecate, another aspect of the ‘Diana’ energy. And it all
happened on Hecate’s day for sacrifice, August 31st. Does anyone doubt that this was a ritual murder? And I’ve not
even nearly finished with the symbolism surrounding her death. Remember what David Berkowitz, the Satanist serial
killer in New York known as the Son of Sam, wrote about those involved in the Satanic network:

“...Satanists (genuine ones) are peculiar people. They aren’t ignorant peasants or semi-literate natives. Rather, their
ranks are filled with doctors, lawyers, businessmen, and basically highly responsible citizens... They are not a
careless group who are apt to make mistakes. But they are secretive and bonded together by a common need and
desire to mete out havoc on society. It was Aleister Crowley who said: ‘I want blasphemy, murder, rape, revolution,
anything bad’.”

It is worth emphasising again here the Satanists’ relationship with female energy.

The challenge we all face is to balance male and female energies and so enjoy the best aspects of them and not the
extremes. The Satanists, however, seek to express only the extremes, thus creating disharmony and conflict. They
use the malevolent, highly negative expressions of the female energy (covert manipulation behind the scenes) to
create the events and circumstances which the extremes of the male energy (macho men, soldiers, terrorism) can
play out in the public arena.

Because of this it appears that the world is controlled and dominated by male energy - it’s a ‘mans world’, but in truth
it is not a world dominated by the male, it is a world dominated by extremes of male and female. I am not talking men
and women here, I mean male and female energy which can be expressed by both men or women. For instance, the
Brotherhood manipulators like Henry Kissinger never see a gun fired in anger.

They are not out there physically fighting (male energy) in the wars they engineer. They are manipulating events from
the shadows and behind our backs, a trait of the negative female energy and symbolized by the story of the Trojan
Horse. The female energy is also the creative force and you can create negatively or positively. The Brotherhood are
highly malevolent, but very creative. For this reason, in esoteric law and symbolism, the female energy (Diana,
Semiramis, Isis, Barati, Britannia) is given different names for its different expressions.

The Egyptians portrayed Isis in white in her positive mode and in black to symbolize her negative aspect. In the same
way we have the symbolism of Diana (positive female) and Hecate (negative female). They are simply different
symbolic names for different manifestations of the female energy. The Satanists of the Brotherhood work with the
Hecate energy and that is why they worship this deity. They are actually worshipping the extreme negative female
energy and it is for this reason that in Satanism the high priestess is considered as important as the priest, if not more

At that Elite centre for Satanism in Belgium, the Castle of Darkness I mentioned in an earlier chapter, the top position
in the hierarchy is not known as the king, but the Queen Mother. So in the Pont de L’Alma Tunnel the positive female
energy (love, compassion, intuition), symbolized by Diana, was eliminated by the negative female energy
(manipulation, ritual death), symbolised by Hecate and the crossroads.

The death of Dodi Fayed was also crucial to the Satanic symbolism. Given the circumstances of his death, it is quite a
coincidence that his real name, Emad El Din, is Arabic for ‘Pillar of Faith’. Dodi was a nickname he was given as a
toddler by his family. This, too, is interesting. It is very close to Dido and in fact ‘Dido’ was the nickname he gave to
Diana. Dido in Greek mythology was the legendary founder and queen of Carthage (an Aryan people connected to
the Phoenicians) and she was the daughter of Belus, king of the Phoenician city of Tyre.

When Dido’s husband was killed by her brother, Pygmalion, she fled with her followers to
North Africa where she purchased Carthage from the native ruler, Larbus. He later
threatened Dido with war unless she married him, but instead she killed herself. But the
most likely symbols for Dodi Fayed’s death can be found in his birthplace, Egypt.
The Brotherhood are obsessed with the symbolism in ancient Egypt of the
Osiris-Horus-Isis trinity (Nimrod-Tammuz-Semiramis) which is expressed in Christianity
as father, son, and holy ghost. Among many things, it symbolises the male and female
energies coming together to create a third force, new life.

To the Egyptians, and therefore the Brotherhood, the son of God was Horus. He was
born to Isis after her husband, Osiris, had been murdered by Set. She gathered together
14 parts of his mutilated body, but she could not find the penis. So she created a penis
and impregnated herself to conceive Horus, the Sun God -Sun King, Horus was Osiris reborn. In Paris, part of this
ritual was played out again.

The car passed the golden-tipped Egyptian obelisk, the penis of Osiris, in the Place de la Concorde, and inside the
vehicle were Diana (another name for Isis) and the Egyptian, Dodi Fayed, representing Osiris. I have heard from
many sources that Diana was pregnant. Her foetus symbolized Horus, the Sun King. In ancient Egypt, they said that
Osiris had to die before Horus could come in. This will sound amazing to most people, but if you study the
unbelievable obsession these people have with ritual and symbolism it makes perfect sense.

Diana may not even have realized she was pregnant. It could have been the foetus they were removing on the
operating table in Paris while they “battled to save her” for hours after she was clinically dead. I have heard
suggestions that the cells from the foetus are being used to clone babies from this genetic mix. These will be ‘Sun
gods’ according to Brotherhood ritual. The cloning of humans has been possible for a long time, as the cloning of
sheep at the Roslyn Institute near Rosslyn Chapel in Scotland has clearly shown.

The Brotherhood’s secret science is always far in advance of anything allowed into the public domain and because of
this the public find it impossible to believe what the Brotherhood can do with drugs and technology. So it is with their
mind control techniques and I am sure that both Diana and Dodi had been under the influence of mind manipulation
over many weeks to ensure the ritual happened as required. For goodness sake, a stage hypnotist can take over the
mind of someone from the audience. Just think what is possible for those mind manipulators at the global cutting edge.

The Pont de L’Alma is one of the most sacred places in the world to the Brotherhood and, as with the street plans in
all their key cities, they made sure the site was full of appropriate symbolism: the bridge, the underground chamber,
the crossroads and the name. Since my own spiritual awakening in 19901 have been guided by my subconscious
intuition to many Earth power centres.

Often I have not been aware of this at the time and only with hindsight have I seen how, on a non-conscious level, I
had been drawn to a major vortex point on the magnetic grid system and often to those of particular importance to the
Brotherhood. In 1994 I was on holiday with my family near the Normandy coast in France and we decided to visit
Paris. It was a long drive, but we had never seen the city before. We drove to Versailles outside Paris and took the
train from there to the station at the Eiffel Tower. It was a hot, humid, and sweaty day, and the area was packed with
people and heavy with traffic.

This combination was so unpleasant that we decided not to stay very long before taking the train back to Versailles,
but first we went for a short walk. We crossed the River Seine by a footbridge near the Eiffel Tower and walked a
hundred yards or so alongside the river bank on the far side before finding a seat to rest. After sitting there for about
ten minutes we walked over the nearby road bridge and back to the railway station to leave the city. We were in the
place for little more than an hour and that is all I had experienced of Paris until I went back to research Diana’s death
for this book.

When I returned to Paris I had quite a shock because I found that seat again where we rested in 1994. It is on top of
the Pont de L’Alma tunnel very close to the 13th pillar where the car crashed! Also, near that seat above the mouth of
the tunnel is a large depiction of a lighted torch. This is the most obvious Brotherhood signature of them all and after
President Kennedy’s ritual killing, the Freemasons erected an obelisk in Dealey Plaza with a lighted torch at the top.
Another flame was placed on his grave.

The one on the Pont de UAlma Tunnel stands on a black pentagram and there isn’t a more powerful Satanic symbol
than that. It is supposed to be a ‘Flame of Liberty’ (a copy of the flame held by the Statue of Liberty) to commemorate
those who died in the Second World War, but it’s location has, predictably, ensured that it has become a shrine to
Diana. One newspaper report said that the French authorities were considering a permanent memorial to Diana at
the Pont de L’Alma - a continuation of the 13th pillar above the ground! I can’t think of anything more sick or more
symbolic than that. The last I heard they planned to open a vegetable garden to commemorate her death and they
were going to pull down a building to make way for it.

                                  The garden is an area of Paris that Diana is never known to have visited and she had
                                   no recorded passion for growing vegetables. So what goes on? Well, first I bet you’ll
                                   find that the vegetable garden to be on another ancient site of some kind, and most
                                   importantly such an inadequate and bizarre memorial will ensure that the flame above
                                   the tunnel will now remain the public shrine to Diana.

The Flame of Liberty was placed on the tunnel entrance in 1987 and I am certain the assassination of Diana at that
spot was planned well before then. It is quite conceivable, given the Brotherhood’s long term planning and meticulous
attention to ritual and symbolic detail, that it was planned for decades. Definitely before the sacrificial lamb was
hooked into the Windsor web to marry Charles. It was Brotherhood symbolism which decided the location of their
wedding at St Paul’s Cathedral.

St Paul’s, with its vast dome, was designed by Sir Christopher Wren, the high Brotherhood initiate. It’s design is
mirrored by both the Congress Building in Washington DC and by the Pantheon in Paris. Brutus, the Trojan who
became first king of the Britons in about 1,103BC, was the man who founded ‘New Troy’, known today as London. He
was another who worshipped the goddess Diana and he is reported to have erected a temple to her on what is now
called Ludgate Hill on the site of a former stone circle. This is in the heart of the City of London financial district, that
centre of Brotherhood control, and today on this site of Diana worship you will find... St Paul’s Cathedral.

In Paris, the Notre Dame (Our Lady) Cathedral is on an ancient site of Diana worship and the ambulance carrying the
princess’s body passed Notre Dame during that bizarre journey to hospital. So Diana was married on an ancient
sacred site to the goddess Diana and she died on the site of an ancient sacrificial chamber of the goddess Diana.
She was also hunted and used by the Windsors to produce heirs and Diana was the ancient goddess of hunting,
fertility and childbirth.

When Prince Charles and Diana’s sisters went to Paris to escort her body back to London, the coffin was draped in
the royal standard, the flag of the Windsors which is covered with the Sun symbol, the lion. Not the flag of the country,
you’ll note, but the flag of the Windsors. Another strange coincidence happened at the Hammersmith Mortuary in
London. As her coffin arrived, the one carrying Dodi was leaving and they apparently crossed at the entrance. What
are the statistical chances of that when both made such very different journeys from Paris? Dodi, we were told, had to
be buried within 24 hours of his death according to Muslim religious law and there was a mad rush by his father to
meet the deadline. There was no autopsy on his body, a quick external examination was considered enough.

At this point, Diana’s brother, Charles, Earl Spencer, then 33, came on the scene after flying back from his home in
Cape Town, South Africa. When Earl Spencer, the Queen’s god-son, made his maiden speech in the House of Lords
in 1993, he chose a rather strange subject, Satanism On The Spencer’s Althorp Estate In Northamptonshire. He
acknowledged that it was going on, but he said he was doing all he could to eradicate it. What a remarkable topic to
introduce in your first speech in the Houses of Parliament.

The Brotherhood Mother Goddess, Arizona Wilder, reports seeing Earl Spencer and his father at some of the
sacrificial rituals she conducted. It was Earl Spencer who announced that, despite her wishes, Diana’s body would not
be interred in the family tomb at the local village church at Great Brington near the estate. Earl Spencer said he
wanted to avoid swamping the village with sightseers and he had decided that Diana would be buried on a man-made
island in the centre of a lake on the Althorp Estate.

The lake is called The Oval and when looked at from above, the island looks like a dot within a circle, a symbol of the
Sun. The flame in a circle is on Kennedy’s grave. Also on the island, Spencer has placed the Brotherhood symbol of
a burning flame and at one stage, Mohamed Al Fayed said he was going to put an ‘eternal flame’ to Diana and Dodi
on the roof of Harrods to mark the first anniversary of their deaths in August 1998. Islands are very much part of the
legends of the goddess Diana and she was supposed to have been born on the island of Delos in the Aegean Sea.

It is also known as the Island of the Dead after Hecate, the patroness of the ‘infernal arts’, the negative aspect of the
Diana goddess energy. Diana is another name for Brito-Martis, the goddess of Crete which was colonised and
developed by the Phoenicians who created the Minoan civilisation.

Brito-Martis was actually a Phoenician goddess, according to Greek and Roman legend. She was the divine
‘daughter’ of Phoinix (correctly spelt) the King of Phoenicia, and was armed, like Diana, with weapons for the chase.
Legend says that Brito-Martis (Diana) sailed from Phoenicia to Argos in Southern Greece and onto Crete where she
was pursued by her unwelcome admirer, Minos. She escaped by retreating to the sea and sailed to Aegina, an island
in the Aegean where stands the temple of Artemis or Diana. Islands and Diana are very much connected in the

Earl Spencer put Diana’s grave among trees on the island and this is classic symbolism because the ancients used to
worship the goddess Diana in the tree groves and this was said to be her most sacred place. Sir James Frazer
describes in his book, The Golden Bough, the Diana rite known as the King of the Wood at Lake Nemi (again a lake is
a big part of Diana legend).

The Lady of the Lake is also Brotherhood symbolism. Frazer says that on the northern shore of Lake Nemi, under the
cliffs on which the modern village of Nemi, near Aricia, is perched, was the sacred grove and sanctuary of Diana
Nemorensis, or Diana of the Wood, the goddess of hunting. Lake Nemi is the most celebrated shrine to the goddess
Diana and here, says Frazer, there grew a tree around which the figure of a priest would be seen with a sword.

A candidate for the priesthood in the cult of Diana could only succeed by killing the present incumbent and he would
only keep the job until someone in turn killed him. The post carried the title of king - King of the Wood and a long line
of priest-kings who served Diana met a violent end. So the goddess Diana is associated with islands and a lake and
was worshipped among the trees. And Earl Spencer puts his sister’s grave among the trees on an island in a lake.

Then there is the strange tale of the black swans. In June 1998, Earl Spencer gave an interview for BBC Television in
which he told of a dream he claimed to have had between the crash in Paris and Diana’s funeral. In the dream, he
said, he had been told to put four black swans on the lake around the island. When he called his estate manager the
next morning and asked him where he would find four black swans, the manager is supposed to have said: “You’ve
heard then?”. “Heard what?”, Spencer claims to have asked. “We’ve been offered four black swans”, the estate
manager replied. Maybe this is true, but, in my view, this story has more to do with flying pigs than flying swans.

Black swans are profound occult symbols used in rituals and were the seal of the infamous Satanist, Catherine de
Medici, who, Arizona Wilder says, was a previous incarnation of the Queen Mother. They appear most obviously in
the ballet, Swan Lake, when the black swan, symbolising the negative female energy, kills the white swan, symbolising
the positive. In other words, Hecate kills Diana. What better symbolism can you have of Swan Lake than black swans
on a lake, as at Althorp? A swan is a derogatory term in Druidism.

Project Monarch slaves who rebel are told that they will be “Turned into swans” and Diana, of course, rebelled against
the Windsors. The number of swans also fits here. Monarch programming includes a term called The Four Gates of
Heaven and four could also symbolise the four phases of the Moon. Earl Spencer has established a ‘temple’ to Diana
at the side of the lake. A number of the stately homes of the British aristocracy have temples or areas featuring the
goddess Diana, among them Blenheim Palace home of the Marlboroughs and Chatsworth House, headquarters of the
Cavendish’s, the Dukes of Devonshire, and both families are related to the Spencers.

Diana was carried in a lead lined coffin and lead is the metal associated in ritual magic with Saturn, possibly from
where we get the name Satan. The colour associated with Saturn and Satanism is black. Diana was also led to her
death across the two key Brotherhood days of Saturn-day and Sun-day. The 15th-century Italian philosopher-doctor
from Horence, Marsiho Ficino, produced talismans for protection and the one for Saturn was engraved on pure lead.
It was said to protect the wearer against death by assassination and ambush and protected women in childbirth.

On Diana’s lead coffin during the funeral were lilies, the flower of Lilith, another version of Hecate and a symbol of the
bloodline. The lilies were chosen by Earl Spencer, Diana’s brother. The lily was also sacred to Astarte, another Diana
deity, and it was used to symbolise the impregnation of the virgin Mary. The ‘blessed virgin’ Juno, ruler of August, was
said to have conceived her saviour-son, Mars, on a magic lily.

The lily is symbolic of the reptilian bloodlines. In the year 656, the 10th Council of Toledo officially made the day of
Juno’s legendary conception of Mars into the Christian Festival of the Mother of God, or Lady Day, insisting that it
commemorated Mary’s miraculous conception of Jesus with the aid of a lily. In France the people knew Lady Day as
Notre Dame de Mars. The symbolism of the lily with the pregnant goddess giving birth to the saviour-god (as in Isis
and Horus) is fascinating, given the stories that Diana was pregnant at the time of her death and the way I have
connected this to the legend of Osiris, Isis and Horus.

There have also been questions about whether Diana is even buried on the island. In the Summer of 1998, the Star
magazine in the United States quoted an unnamed “senior source” at Buckingham Palace as saying she was secretly
cremated and according to a report in the Los Angeles Times some people in the village of Great Brington also don’t
believe she is buried on the island. I know these reports are true from my own sources.

One resident quoted by the LA Times said that the night her coffin was taken to Althorp for burial, the village had
been ‘invaded’ by the army, police and special forces units, and all the villagers were hustled into their homes. She
said that the crematorium at the church was working late into the night. Betty Andrews, the former cook and
housekeeper at Althorp, is quoted by Star magazine as saying:

“There’s a strange feeling amongst the villagers that we may not be hearing the complete picture and if this is so are
we really surprised? ”


(Rose's note:  Again, while we do not know the true identity of Anonymous, we find his/her writings highly intriguing.
They appear well thought out and he/she makes connections of events that many do not. In many cases
Anonymous's views mirror some of our own. We put these here for overview and for your discretion.)