Date Posted: 07-03-12
"Powerful vested interests in the British media prevent the proof of life after death reaching the general public. While
materialist scientists censor the scientific journals, Christians censor the media. Today Colin Fry and other mediums
have to describe their evidence of the afterlife as 'for entertainment only'.) Wikipedia impose censorship on this
subject and many genuine gifted mediums are either omitted from Wikipedia or are described in terms to make them
appear fraudulent tricksters.and there is enormous difficulty in gaining access to the press, national television and
"The above statement made and are so informative and telling and another constructive and powerful way of keeping
people ignorant and therefore much more easily and successfully controlled and manipulated. Unfortunately many
people do believe everything presented to them via the media in whatever format is the truth, a truth! What they
receive actually is diluted, changed or fictional.
In keeping with this a well known British Entertainer, Bruce Forsythe ,was recently interviewed and spoke
of his having not spoken to the press for almost a decade following a programme that he was hosting was torn to pieces
by the press in spite of it's having 14 million viewers when after one season due to the non - stop panning of it by the
media critics it was cancelled. As he told whatever criticism the press could aim at it they did so because he had gained
unpopularity for leaving his position as compere of another highly successful television programme the "Generation
Game" to present his own show,"The Bruce Forsythe Show". He giving the example that Sir Elton John was appearing
on the programme and during the show he had to go to the car park to get something from his car needed for his
performance, which he then carried out successfully, however the press reported in having spotted him leaving the
studio that he had walked out on the show! As Bruce said for all the Elton John fans all over the world news like this,
even though not true, did neither he or his show any favours!
A perfect example of the press being so powerfully constructive in destroying a personality or a venture if
this is their intention to do. I said in Panorama of the Media "They saw me as a product that sat on a shelf and sold well
and also that the higher they place you, the bigger the drop!" Quite why there is this embargo imposed upon anything to
do with the After - Life remains something of a mystery to me. As people know I certainly believed in it counting
amongst some of my closest friends as well as associates Astrologers, Psychic Mediums and Healers. The Royals
themselves have someone they consult behind closed doors! It is one way of always being ahead of the game so a useful
strategy to utilise if one that is proven to be correct and therefore the channel of the information imparted .. trusted! As
with anything there needs to be common sense and discernment used in selecting the person naturally and never a
complete trust and reliance that everything told is gospel as messages are being energetically transmitted and energies
change all the time but this is why if the same message is repeated or given in perhaps slightly different wording but
meaning the same thing, resulting in the same outcome, it is therefore one much more likely to be true. Andrew was
told by a gypsy fortune teller at Shepherds Bush market that he was about to meet a tall, dark, handsome man just a
month or two before meeting 6'2" Michael a Greek Cypriot from Limmassol, Cyprus, someone very special to him. So as
with everything in life, though many such people operating at such venues are not the most reliable to be influenced and
guided by, there are exceptions to every rule!
Andrew convincing media people that he is channeling me is one of the hardest challenges anyone could
face. Because it is me, Diana, it remains a very sensitive subject matter for all too obvious reasons but because he is my
channel he has not only made this known to the media on both sides of the Atlantic but also to people like my boys, my
bother and Mohamed al - Fayed. He has to date been acknowledged by someone representing William and has of course
personally channeled me to other people who knew me and have privately recognised that it is me but have professional
and personal reputations to protect and both ironically being media people! Andrew has therefore been given to know
that the fact I am speaking will not be something immediately seized upon by media. Alternatively "D" notices given to
any such communications received from me and all fearing inviting litigious circumstances upon themselves in
entertaining the idea of even suggesting publicly that Diana Speaks might be the reality.
It says above Colin Fry and other well known and respected mediums must present themselves and what
they do as "Entertainment", an equally suitable term I would have thought for the Queen's annual speech when she is
controlled to speak about her governments proposals and now everyone knowing from experience that every
government making empty promises or obligations that often for one reason or another are not met. Yet these
pronounciations everyone is supposed to take seriously. It is also a reason why Party Political Broadcasts are largely
ignored as not being even mildly entertaining! Were people to be awakened to the reality of life after death being a
reality the benefits of such a realisation would be enormous, naturally.
Many people fear death as it is the unknown but were they to realise and be given substantial evidence
and proof of the fact life goes on, albeit in a different way, such immediate comfort would be found and particularly
with those ill and dying who are many of them very frightened and so would benefit from being given such personal
comfort and reassurance. Likewise of course their loved ones, family and friends would emotionally benefit from such
profound knowledge being impart to them. Andrew has lost both parents but his father dying of lung cancer which
confined Brian to bed for the last three months of his life, he suffering the condition for six months, so a highly
intelligent man, his brain was not effected but physically he was immobile and could not speak, imagine that nightmare.
However Andrew knows his father is well again now and not suffering pain and immobility. His Mother dying suddenly,
a very sprightly and independent woman who seemed fit and healthy suddenly dying, Andrew seeing her just the day
before but weeks before this Ann swearing Andrew to keep it a secret as she was a very proud woman; that she was
losing her sight rapidly and crying with Andrew about this realisation which would have meant for her a living death,
reliance on others, no longer driving her car so a complete loss of the independence she valued so much! Now Andrew
knows spared the horror of facing this personal indignity-- Ann likewise can see again. These are powerful realisations
for him to have as they are deeply planted seeds of knowledge that keeps him from engaging in melancholia or sadness
regarding them passing and likewise similar stories with partners he has loved!
Why as I say the Media want to be so constructive in denying many people such peace of mind is, as I
have said, something I don't fully understand and especially in the United Kingdom. In Muslim countries where people
speaking from the after life as such is not believed in, this being therefore something much more understandable as it
would prove itself in being controversial but in a multicultural and a developed and advanced society, such prehistoric
and indeed archaic attitudes being adhered to and maintained seems therefore to me anyway to be somewhat odd! The
investigative nature I'd have personally expected from journalists seems more inclined to be one to bury the evidence
rather than investigate it when it comes to the sensitive topic of Diana, which proves what ? They’ve something to hide,
something they do not want to take the risk of investigating and uncovering by delving in too deeply and so therefore
fear, but isn’t that all too obvious!"
With love from,
http://www.greaterreality.com/ An interesting site to visit !
Date Posted: 07-03-12
A Psychic Predicted Princess Diana's Death 4 Days Before it Happened!
Timothy B. Benford
Oct 28, 2007
In the decade since the car crash in a Paris tunnel that took the life of Princess Diana, her boyfriend Dodi Fayed, and
the driver of the Mercedes, a handful of so-called psychics have claimed they predicted the tragedy. As expected, the
media has ignored ad dismissed nearly all of them as screwballs or people seeking publicity by being associated with
the worldwide interest in Diana. For the most part these wannabe-psychics have been unable to provide
documentation or public pronouncements which were on record before the tragic events of that Saturday night and
early Sunday morning in August, 1997.
For the most part, but not totally. Not 100%. A prediction that Princess Diana would be killed, the same week it actually
happened, is part of the official police record in a small police station in the U.K. But, like other such predictions, it was
not taken seriously.
In the early years after Diana's death, references to this information was available on the Internet. But with the
passage of time it has passed from view and is now very difficult to find. But for anyone who cares to check for
themselves, the prediction does exist in the police records Mountain Ash police station in South Wales.
For those who are interested, herewith are the known facts, as researched by this writer, and which appear in the
book "To Kill A Princess, The Diana Plot.
On Wednesday, August 27th 1997, as Diana and Dodi were frolicking in the Mediterranean aboard the Jonikal,
Edward Williams an area resident, went to the Mountain Ash police station in South Wales just after 2 PM to report a
disturbing a premonition he had about the Princess of Wales.
Police in the U.K., and everywhere for that matter, were accustomed to people coming in to report incidents of crop
circles, UFO sightings, or alien encounters. Such things went with the job.
On the other hand, premonitions or dreams about assassinations, physical harm or great danger to public officials
were looked at differently in the event that what was being reported was actually a veiled or unconscious threat from
the person dispensing such information.
However, Williams demeanor, and past predictions, put him in a different class than people reporting the usual
fantasies. So much so that the interviewing officer filed an 'incident' report that was duly forwarded to Special Branch
officers. That report appears in the department's permanent police blotter and reads, verbatim:
"On the 27th August 1997 at 14:12 hrs, a man by the name of Edward Williams came to Mountain Ash police station.
He said he was a psychic and predicted that Princess Diana was going to die.
"In previous years he has predicted that the Pope and Ronald Reagan were going to be the victims of assassination
attempts. On both occasions he was proved to be correct. Mr. Williams appeared to be quite normal.
Mr. Williams statement was taken and properly logged into the Mountain Ash police record in South Wales. After more
than ten years, it is most likely now in the department's archives.
" Thank you very much Tony for posting this and something I feel worthy of recording on my
site for very obvious reasons, it adds invaluable fuel to as Andrew and Rose have personally experienced and can verify
with witnesses to back their claims if needs must, being ignored regarding their personal associations with me and their
involvement with the Diana Work. I find it odd as there is no such thing as coincidence that the same date August 27th
that this prediction was reported to the Welsh police concerning Diana, Princess of Wales that in 1991 on the same day
Andrew and Michael met and his significance spiritually in Andrew's life something written and spoken about on my site
and the fact the prediction was given to them 4 days in advance of the event happening as I warned in 2005 the British
Newspaper Editot 4 days in advance of the London bombs happening and for this reason did my homwork on the
Spiritual Significance of the number 4 .. all pretty amazing!"
Also and quite unrelated but equally significant the reigning Monarch automatically on ascension
to the throne in their coronation becomes Head of the Church of England which does not officially recognise divorce
and at the moment H.R.H. The Prince of Wales and direct heir to the throne is divorced and married to a divorcee
making a mockery of this unless the rule book is changed; or is it a deliberate ploy to be used legally and so officially of
course to subjugate him and jump a generation to William being crowned King in place of his father?
I would imagine they both are of course aware of the implications affecting both their lives if
ammendments are not made to this or as I say failure to do so will illustrate the Monarchy being officially a complete
farce which will not enhance its public reputation which William and Catherine seem to be working extremely hard with
Her Majesty to personally rebuild and for this resason therefore something I would imagine therefore needing serious
With love from,
Four is the number of the great elements: Earth, Air, Fire, and Water.
Four are the regions of the earth: North, South, East, and West.
Four are the divisions of the day: Morning, Noon, Evening, and Midnight.
Four are the seasons of the year - Spring, Summer, Autumn, and Winter.
Four always has reference to all that is created. It is emphatically the number of Creation; of man in his relation to the
world as created;The sun, moon, and stars completed the work, and they were to give light upon the earth which had
been created, and to rule over the day and over the night.
Date Posted: 07-03-12
According to British Constitutional Law H.M. Queen must give her throne to her eldest son and heir H.R.H. The Prince
of Wales. He is the direct blood descendant in a male primogeniture system which the British monarchy uses. This
system has recently been placed under scrutiny and there are rumours that it will change with William and Catherine’s
children. The questions are raised, will Camilla become Queen? Will Catherine become Queen? What happens when
Charles dies or abdicates and Prince William, the current Duke of Cambridge takes over?
There are three types of royal Queens, the first being Queen Regnant, who is a direct descendant in the blood line.
This title also holds executive power over all royal decisions. The second is called Queen Consort, who is the wife of
the King. The third is called a Queen Dowager and this is usually reserved for the Queen Mother or the widow of a
deceased king. When Charles becomes the King of England, Camilla will have the right to be called Queen Consort, a
person who carries the title but has no say in any royal affairs. Camilla has a wealth of titles bestowed upon her,
including Princess of Wales, but she decided to use Duchess of Cornwall instead, out of respect for the late Princess
Diana and knowing the public outcry there would have been making her people popularity even lower than it already
was. It has been said that Camilla will not use the Queen Consort title, but will rather use Princess Consort instead.
Prince William will be upgraded to the official title of His Royal Highness Prince William Arthur Philip Louis of Wales
when his father becomes the King and Catherine will be known as Her Royal Highness Prince William Arthur Philip
Louis of Wales, Princess of Wales.
Now we get to the tricky bit. Catherine, currently the Duchess of Cambridge, is not the first commoner to be married to
a future king, but she will unfortunately never carry the title of Queen Regnant as she is not a direct descendant, and
will forever be known as Queen Consort, much in the line of Prince Philip is the Prince Consort to Queen Elizabeth.
Catherine will also have absolutely no say in any royal matters as the future King William will be in charge. We also
have the tricky question of when the future King Charles will die or abdicate. His death will result in people kneeling at
William’s feet, kissing his hand and saying, ‘The King is dead. Long live the King!”
The recent Order of Precedence has Catherine curtsying to all types of royals above her when William is not present.
Catherine might never truly be a Queen Regnant, but likely that she will become a legendary figure in the future of the
British monarchy, forever known as Queen Consort Catherine Elizabeth Windsor.
“The Queen tells the Duchess of Cambridge to curtsy to the ‘blood princesses"
The Duchess of Cambridge may be a future queen, but she has discovered that there
are several women in the Royal family to whom she must show reverence. The Queen
has updated the Order of Precedence in the Royal Household to take into account
Prince William's wife. The new rules of Court make it clear that the former
Catherine Middleton, when she is not accompanied by Prince William, must curtsy to
the “blood princesses”, the Princess Royal, Princess Alexandra, and the daughters
of the Duke of York, Princesses Beatrice and Princess Eugenie.
When William is with her, Catherine does not need to bend the knee to either of them, but she must curtsy to the
Prince of Wales, the Duchess of Cornwall, the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh. Despite being married to the Queen’
s son, the Countess of Wessex will, however, have to curtsy to Catherine, even when William is not present.
“Updating the Order of Precedence has been a simple matter of following the precedent set when Prince Charles the
Prince of Wales married the former Mrs. Camilla Parker Bowles,” a courtier tells me.
A document is said to have been circulated privately in the Royal Household, clarifying Catherine’s status. When the
Order was last updated, after Prince Charles’s second marriage, in 2005, the Countess of Wessex was reported to be
upset that she now had to curtsy to Camilla. “Sophie didn’t like it one bit,” a senior courtier was quoted as saying. The
Earl of Wessex’s wife had previously been the second-highest ranking woman in the Royal family because neither of
the Queen’s other sons, Charles and Prince Andrew, were married.
However, after Charles remarried, the Queen changed the Order of Precedence “on blood principles” so that neither
Princess Anne now the Princess Royal nor Princess Alexandra, the granddaughter of George V, would have to curtsy
to Camilla when her husband was not present. Although the etiquette may seem arcane, it is taken very seriously by
the Royal family, whose members bow and curtsy to each other in public and in private. A vivid illustration came after
the Trooping the Colour ceremony last weekend, when the Duchess of Cambridge could be seen curtsying to Prince
Philip on the balcony of Buckingham Palace.
" Catherine will naturally adapt to and accept these rules and regulations as a manner of respect but privately I am sure
not being someone to ordinarily stand on ceremony, as neither are William and Harry, will have a little private giggle
with her husband about it all as I did with Charles! He once whispring to me at an official function as the National
Anthem was played "Oh, they're playing our song again, darling!" .. unfortunately earning me an icy stare from Her
Majesty who caught me, albeit trying to be discreet about it, giggling!"
With love from,
Date Posted: 07-03-12
12th June 2012
The Diamond Jubilee celebrations winding down it is reported that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are excitedly
planning for a family even having chosen baby names. A source has told "NOW" magazine Prince William is
determined unsurprisingly to honour his late mother Princess Diana and his grandmother the Queen but Elizabeth
also being Catherine's middle name.
The Queen is delighted with the news having urged William to start a family to secure an heir to the throne and has
even made it known that baby-making should become a priority above any royal duties, starting a family being a main
priority. William's parents married July 29th 1981 and William was born June 21st 1982! The Queen has apparently
told William not to let Royal duties get in the way of a family and his happiness.”
Many sources are already speculating that the 30 year-old Duchess is already pregnant after she was spotted
showing off a small bump during a shopping trip just before the Jubilee weekend though this has not been officially
Thanks to a change in the law William and Catherine’s eldest child will be Monarch whether it is a girl or a boy. Could
we have a potential Queen Diana?
What a lovely tribute!
" I am now giggling at the thought of Her Majesty having to call her granddaughter by name, cringing every
time she did so if it is to be believed my name is one not spoken in royal circles. Worse even than her facing that ring
which Catherine prominently and proudly displays at every opportunity. I would therefore image that Elizabeth might
be more appropriate as a first name though of course equally one favoured by both parents and the other names strictly
middle names... but it will be their decision naturally.
As for Catherine rumoured to be with child-- so was I in the South of France for a similar reason photographed
there in a leopard print swimsuit-- and as I have assured people I wasn't! I wanted to be the Queen of Hearts, not Tarts,
or add fuel to the ammunition already being fired against me by my romantic involvement with Dodi by being an
unmarried Mother. I respected my boys far too much to embarrass them in this way and had more self - respect!
I also agree that William and Catherine's happiness being the one priority and not adhering to official protocol
and duty as Duke and Duchess of Cambridge!"
With love from,