Date: Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:12 AM
Subject: Urgent Notice for the site!

                     " Hello Rose,
                                            I think this link ought to be posted on my site to impress upon people that this was the
major catastrophe in London that in calling Andrew Spedding at the Daily Express newspaper I tried to help
prevent from happening but of course coupled with his rudeness and sarcasm to me and consequently mocking
the serious warning given by me and Christian, ( Who he might have been taken notice of, even if ignoring me!)
that he really does have blood on his hands! I have forwarded this note to Channel 4; hence the website address
included in the email so a researcher might indeed do their homework on it; though appreciating there is likely
to be a "D" NOTICE upon any correspondence from me, so this email address in keeping with the rest of the
media but as with my call to that newspaper, legally and for security reasons it necessitates being recorded
naturally. "
                                            With love from,
                                                                  Diana xx

(Rose's note: After seeing this film footage about the London bombings I can only shake my head over what
might have been...or more precisely what might
NOT have been...had the cynical and obviously rude media
man who was contacted by Diana/Andrew had set aside his preconceived belief systems as to what was
feasible and had contacted someone with authority to have prompted an investigation. While it is a fine thing
to have an inquest now into the London bombings would it not have been better to not have to have them at
all? Sad, very sad!)


Date posted: 02/21/11

( Rose's note:  At the inquest concerning the London bombings of 2005 there was mentioned that there had
been   prior knowledge of a plan to do exactly that...detonate bombs within London. As you can see here in
Diana's  precis she and Andrew tried to alert the authorities via a media man, Andrew Spedding, who fobbed
them off and insulted Andrew. Rather than using prudence and considering it something of potential
seriousness he instead  made a joke of it, that joke aimed at Andrew's mental health. Well, Mr. Spedding, no
one is laughing now at the suggestion that bombs went off in London, are they? Seems the "joke" is on you!
By the way...are you any relation to David Spedding, the "big dog" that was with MI6???

Perhaps the information given Mr. Spedding was passed along anyway and it was partly Diana alerting the
media that may have led to the events mentioned in the below article? We cannot be sure, of course, but
regardless of that issue it seems that there is conflicting stories being told and perhaps a potential cover-up
that the authorities
did know something in advance and fobbed it off/covered their own butts as well?  Ahhh...
the depth of deception is ever deepening, is it not?)

Entire article:   
Unanswered questions in London bombings
                                                             By Chris Marsden
                                                              11 July 2005

The Israeli Embassy warning

A third controversial issue is the early report that the Israeli Embassy in London had been informed of a
possible bombing prior to the first explosion.

A report published by the Associated Press (AP) at 12:16 p.m. on July 7, authored by Amy Teibel in
Jerusalem, stated, “British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday’s explosions
that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.”

The article continued: “Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had planned to attend an economic
conference in a hotel over the subway stop where one of the blasts occurred, and the warning prompted him
to stay in his hotel room instead, government officials said....

“Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had
received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to
the economic conference.

“The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the nature of his position.”

Within hours, the original Associated Press report had been removed, following denials by Israeli officials in
Tel Aviv and London. But the report had already been taken up by numerous publications internationally. AP
replaced its original article with another, headlined, “Israel ‘Not Warned’ about London Attacks.”

Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom denied that the Embassy received any warnings, saying, “There was no
early information about terrorist attacks.” He told Israel Army radio that Netanyahu had planned to attend an
Israeli corporate investment conference at the Great Eastern hotel near the Liverpool Street subway station,
but “after the first explosion our finance minister received a request not to go anywhere.”

Netanyahu told World Net Daily that reports that he received prior warning about the terror attacks “are
entirely false.... When the first bomb went off, we were departing our hotel. While we were on our way out, the
security people said there was an explosion near the area I was scheduled to speak. They asked us to go
back and stay put in our hotel.”

When he was questioned about the report on Sky News, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair was
more equivocal in his response. He said he could not comment on Israeli reports that their embassy in London
had received a warning phone call from police minutes before the blasts. “Of course, if there had been any
kind of specific warnings we would have dealt with it.... We are not aware of any warning at the moment.”

Stratfor says Israel warned UK

The report also prompted a rebuttal by the intelligence analysis web site Stratfor, which has links to US
intelligence and military authorities and is said to have a number of ex-CIA agents on its payroll. Stratfor
denied the AP story, but then alleged that, in fact, Israel had given the UK prior warning of an attack on

Strafor wrote on July 7, “Contrary to original claims that Israel was warned ‘minutes before’ the first attack,
unconfirmed rumours in intelligence circles indicate that the Israeli government actually warned London of the
attacks ‘a couple of days’ previous. Israel has apparently given other warnings about possible attacks that
turned out to be aborted operations. The British government did not want to disrupt the G8 summit in
Gleneagles, Scotland, or call off visits by foreign dignitaries to London, hoping this would be another false

“The British government sat on this information for days and failed to respond. Though the Israeli government
is playing along publicly, it may not stay quiet for long. This is sure to apply pressure on Blair very soon for his
failure to deter this major terrorist attack.”