Date Posted: 04/24/12





Interview with John Morgan - mp3 5.1M

Exclusive and comprehensive interview with John Morgan, Australian author of new book out this week Diana, The
British Cover Up. He looks at a death threat to her beforehand from Conservative Armed Forces minister Nicholas
Soames and discusses motives for murder as well as describing the mysterious halting and ‘rocking’ of the ambulance
which was taking Diana to hospital. Did Princess Diana survive the crash only to be murdered in the ambulance? Also
a look at the new film on the same subject by Keith Allen premiering at Cannes this week ‘Unlawful Killing’.





"Hello Everyone
            I do hope that people listen to the Radio Broadcast and not in this instance to focus on Paris, though the points
discussed are pretty shocking, but rather the London Bombings of 7/7/2005 and so the ones I warned of happening.
Now if, as it seems to be being suggested during this very informative radio show, they were organised by the British
Secret Service this would make sense as to why my warnings were not taken seriously.
             Let us suppose for a moment Andrew Spedding really didn't believe in what was being told to him by me, he could
easily have said minus the expletives used to me, look Andrew what is it you are saying? In other words made it clear
that he did not believe in the speaker, she who was being channeled but then since this was a serious matter, why not as a
newspaper editor be interested enough to gain some insight inrto it?
            As I have said Andrew gave his full name and Swedish address so he was not hiding making an anonymous call
which might have been more suspect! Why not because as the interview suggests the media is controlled in not a
Stalinist Regime but a Semi - Free State but one clearly in which people are not told the complete truth. In the case a
murder by example in the public's interest often the reality, the true facts of the crime being all too grisly to describe in
detail, the images being likewise far too graphic to illustrate, so a diluted version is televised on the news programmes
responsible for reporting the murder.
           Now if this is to be believed then, more cause for alarm on Andrew Spedding's part as how the hell would Andrew
Russell - Davis, living in Malmo, Sweden know about a British Intelligence Operation due to being carried out four days
after he made the call; unless he himself was directly involved or knew someone who was? If so why then if he did,
would he call a British Newspaper warning them about it? It would explain f course why no interest in it was shown and
no public warning given, which it could have been advising it might be a hoax but since it would involve a bomb attack
in London, people to be vigilant!
            I would imagine Mr. Spedding's head spinning after the 'phone call and four days later in need of seeing a
psychiatrist himself because if as I would imagine thorough homework was conducted by data base and involving the
services of G.C.H.Q. in Cheltenham which operates to monitor calls for British Intelligence as well as other things; to
determine if Andrew was known and he'd have been found to not be; checks made on who he associated with, this
information I am quite sure would be readily available to them in the interests of national security and particularly he
speaking openly of such a serous issue, then the only other answer that could logically be determined is that he had just
spoken to the dead Diana, Princess of Wales!"
                                                                                              With love from,
                                                                                                              Diana xx






Date Posted: 04/24/12



Critical questions and issues regarding the death of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed

1. The whereabouts of Brenda Wells. She has been reported missing and her statements as interpreted by us give
concrete circumstantial evidence of foul play since her statements assert that she was impeded from entering into the
Alma tunnel at the critical moments before the accident as a black Fiat Uno was allowed to pass her.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

2.Production of all her statements directly or indirectly bearing on her being impeded from entering the Alma tunnel at
the critical time in issue.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

3.The identity of those in the black Fiat Uno. This car without question played a role in the accident as its paint was
found on the Mercedes driven by Henri Paul.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

4.The identity of those in the white Mercedes. There were also reports that white paint was found on the Mercedes
and this car was seen leaving the scene in a suspicious manner behind a small black car, manifestly the black Fiat
Uno.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

5.The identity of the three persons on the two motorcycles operating in unison with the black Fiat Uno.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

6.The identity of the "fireman" who immediately had contact with the passengers in the Mercedes. He was present at
the scene moments after the accident and before police or fire rescue ambulances were notified or called to the
scene. He was photographed by a passing car. Where did he come from?

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

7.An exact accounting from the ambulance crew of the (one hour) time between Diana's entry into the ambulance and
being taken to a hospital 6 kilometers away.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

8.Identification of all those in the ambulance with Diana AT ANY TIME.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

9.Production of statements from everyone in the ambulance about what was done by each during the course of
Diana's entry into the ambulance and arrival at the hospital.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

10.Disclosure whether anyone in the ambulance urged that Diana should be brought quickly to the hospital and
further whether any telephone calls or other communications of whatever nature were received by anyone on the
ambulance, and, if so from whom, urging that Diana be quickly brought to the hospital, inquiring what was taking so
long, or disclosing that a team of medical specialists were awaiting her arrival.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

11.Disclosure whether Diana received any blood transfusions, and, if so, what type of blood was given her, and
disclosure what quantities of her blood type were on the ambulance.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

12.If there was not an adequate supply of her blood type on the ambulance, an explanation in this one regard why
Diana was not rushed to the hospital.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

13.Disclosure whether the ambulance stopped during its journey to the hospital, why, and whether anyone or anything
entered into or left (was removed from) the ambulance during its one hour journey to the hospital.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

14.Disclosure of findings as to who was responsible for misinformation that the roof of the car had to be cut off to free
Diana from the wreckage.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

15.Explanation of who was responsible for the misinformation that the Mercedes was an armored car, further falsely
attributed to the lengthy time lapse in getting Diana to the hospital.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

16.Confirmation that Diana was immediately accessible and removable from the Mercedes to wit: the accident
presented no material physical impediment to her removal from the car.

Status: Confirmed by media reports.

17.Disclosure of how the physicians and medical specialists awaiting Diana's arrival at the hospital were preparing for
her; why no one suggested or prepared a heart-lung bypass machine, and disclosure of how many of the medical
team were interviewed by media at the hospital prior to Diana's arrival.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

18.Disclosure of whether the Chief of Police and the Interior Minister for the country were singularly or jointly present
at the hospital awaiting Diana's arrival.

Status: Media accounts confirm Interior Minister at hospital and suggest that the Police Chief was also there with him.

19.An answer to why both the Chief of Police and Interior Minister who were admittedly mystified over the inordinate
time to deliver Diana to the hospital, did not call to get an answer as to why the ambulance was taking so long.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

20.An answer as to how two escort motorcycles could "lose" the ambulance with an identification of the two police
officers on the motorcycles.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

21.An answer whether they were told or authorized to leave the ambulance, and if so, by whom and when.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

22.An answer whether they communicated with anyone in the ambulance that night.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

23.An answer whether anyone from the ambulance or any other person at any time from the moment of the accident
rode as a passenger on any of the police motorcycles accompanying the Diana ambulance.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

24.Statements from the motorcycle policemen regarding the inordinate journey of the ambulance and anything else
with regard to their involvement, official or otherwise, that evening.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

25.An answer to whether any of the medical team awaiting Diana were in contact with the ambulance and further
disclosure whether any in the medical team, during the inordinate journey of the ambulance, were urging that she be
brought to the hospital as quickly as possible.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

26.Disclosure of what report/information, and from whom, the medical team, awaiting Diana's arrival, received from the
ambulance as to the specific nature of Diana's injuries and condition.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

27.Clarification whether the occupant(s) in the Fiat Uno seen in front of the Mercedes after the accident, or
passengers on the two motorcycles in issue, would have had sufficient time, in a foul-play scenario, to visit the
crashed Mercedes to artificially intervene with the health and welfare of the occupants to wit: administer any
substance which would cause Henri Paul to generate the reported intoxication levels achieved from the tests
conducted. Disclosure whether there is any substance which could have been injected into Henri Paul moments after
his death to support, in whole or part, the intoxication levels and findings reported thereafter.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

28.Clarification whether the skid marks in the tunnel were professionally preserved and if not , why not. If preserved,
disclosure whether Henri Paul straight braked or was forced over to the side by another car, a matter according to
accident professionals otherwise determinable from the skid markings.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

29.Disclosure why French authorities would turn down the offer of Daimler-Benz hours after the accident to
immediately investigate and analyze the crash site.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

30.An answer to the hypothetical that if Henri Paul was deliberately blinded temporarily by intense light (what would
look to those outside the tunnel as photographers' flash bulbs), whether there could have been a created condition by
the involved vehicles which would cause Henri Paul, on regaining his vision from the blinding light, to swerve to the
left, thinking that by doing so he was avoiding causing injury to himself, his passengers and/or to others outside the
car.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

31.Alternatively, or in addition to 30, whether the left front tire in particular was carefully preserved and investigated to
inspect for damage/ puncture which could have caused the car to dramatically swerve to the left at the very time Henri
Paul was blinded and holding his hands up to instinctively protect his eyes from the blinding light.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

32.Alternatively or in addition to 30 and 31, whether the Fiat or white Mercedes could have had a mechanical device
which could have deliberately pushed the Mercedes to the left without leaving any markings of the intervention, the
device being covered by rubber or otherwise.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.

33.Whether Diana by turning around was attempting to identify the driver of the Fiat or motorcycle(s), and why.

Status: Unanswered/unresolved.


                
 Regarding the accident and death of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed

1.It involved Diana, Princess of Wales, Mother of a future King of the United Kingdom

2.It occurred just prior to an anticipated announcement of engagement to Dodi Fayed.

3.Her death eviscerated the steep problems which would have faced the Royals and England had she in fact married
Dodi, or worse, become pregnant during the marriage.

4.The original focus should not have been on Henri Paul but the fact that Diana could have survived the accident.

5.The Police Chief for Paris, France and the Interior Minister for the country, jointly admitted that they were surprised
at the inordinate delay in the ambulance delivering Diana to the hospital. Yet no one picked up a phone to call the
ambulance.

6.No facts have been revealed as to who was on the ambulance, or what treatment was rendered to Diana, and who
made the decisions to take one hour to bring her to a hospital 6 kilometers from the accident site. It moreover is
unlikely that the ambulance even carried sufficient amounts of blood she needed.

7.The ambulance was originally accompanied by two police motorcycles, who "lost" the ambulance.

8.Diana's suffered an injury to her left pulmonary vein, not to her aorta, which we understand is the type of injury
normally sustained in a "deceleration" incident. She would have materially benefited if she was quickly delivered to the
hospital and placed on a heart lung bypass unit. Neither was done.

9.Misinformation was released that the Mercedes was armored to support why it took so long to get Diana to a
hospital. Only after intense world interest and focus did salient truthful facts became available including that she could
have been swiftly removed from the car and scene and whisked to a hospital where 25 specialists were awaiting her.

10.A picture was taken showing Diana not looking at the photographer taking the picture but at a motorcycle behind
the car. To do so she had to fully turn around, and it would appear that she was trying to identify those on the
motorcycle. Why?

11.Trevor Rees-Jones put on his seat belt. Diana was a devoted seat belt user. If the focus and concern was Henri
Paul then they would have simply told him to stop the car or pull over. Diana and Dodi both could handle another
confrontation with the press. They wouldn't risk their lives to allow someone driving erratically to continue.

12.To further attest that Henri Paul wasn't their concern, we have Brian Anderson seeing the Mercedes driving in a
straight path. We have Trevor Rees-Jones remembering nothing unusual about Henri Paul. We have the fact that
Henri Paul parked his car normally, a feat hard to do when highly intoxicated, thereafter walking normally, even
speaking with both Dodi and Diana. Yet the contention is that this man was a chronic alcoholic, and based on this
contention we should all blindly accept it and go on with our lives.

13.We do not hear the fact that during the course of Henri Paul's chronic long term alcoholic condition he was a
licensed pilot with 600 hours flying time. As one news story stated: "'Flying an aircraft through fog is not something
you can do just hoping for the best,' Jean-Andre Cahazuc, his former instructor, told one French newspaper. 'It takes
discipline, and Paul was the complete opposite of a clown.'"

14.While the media reports the French conducting one of the most thorough auto accident investigations in history, it
is already a sham since they have polluted the opportunity to obtain critical evidence. Moreover, the investigators
seem to discount and belittle the evidence of a Gary Hunter and Brenda Wells, while at the same time discouraging
others to come forward. The press and media moreover circumvent any follow-up or discussion concerning what Wells
in particular had to say. Brenda Wells is nowhere to be found, as far as we know.

15.It doesn't take an Einstein to recognize that the accident took place in an area where the chances of witnesses
were minimized. Sheer coincidence? I don't think so, when the mystery black car and two motorcycles seemingly made
their move in the tunnel, and Brenda Wells has effectively stated that she was stymied from entering the tunnel at this
very critical time window.

16.How can the French leak and then confirm that they are bent on seeing here a routine accident caused by an
"addicted" long term alcoholic until and unless they know the identity of the passengers on the motorcycles and in the
mystery black car. To even assert blame under the circumstances and facts detailed above is an abomination of
responsibility and accountability and an insult to the public.

17.There are obviously forces who want to derail intelligent thought, press coverage and investigation of the Diana
accident and death. The investigation and press and media coverage of the Diana accident and death are vastly
important to the future of all citizens of the world. If the press and media can be manipulated, if anyone wishing to
pursue serious inquiry and discussion can be thwarted, then do such characteristics reflect democracy, or autocracy?
In a democratic society and environment a free, open, and aggressively inquiring press and media is essential to
offset the power and control of central government and control. In the new world order being successfully pursued this
past decade plus, it is imperative to preserve the power and responsibilities of the press and media. If they fail here,
then one has to question on what principles and platform the evolving central government operates. Can people in an
expanding capitalistic environment, where opportunity seemingly expands, at least for a period of time, recognize the
erosion taking place to important democratic platforms. In the new world order, are elementary democratic precepts
inherently in conflict with it? Is this conflict evidenced by the Diana's accident and death?  I think so!

                                                                                                                                                                   Anonymous



Date Posted: 04/24/12

A Good Guess???

Diana, Princess of Wales, reported a plot to assassinate her. Diana documented her concerns in a letter that she
entrusted to the former Royal Butler, Mr Paul Burrell. She identified the man behind the plot. Diana was warned about
a conspiracy against her by a sympathetic insider. A member of the Royal Family warned the princess: "You need to
be discreet, even in your own home, because 'they' are listening all the time."

After many years of experience as a senior employee of the Royal household, Mr Burrel recalls: "It is a matter of
routine that members of government and the royal family are monitored." Princess Diana complained of being spied
upon and bugged by "dark forces". She declined the police protection provided by Scotland Yard because these
officers are considered "tools of the state". Burrell revealed that Diana was tipped-off by a private contact within the
intelligence community: "She was being cautious, not paranoic, because she was acting on sound information
received from someone who had worked for the British intelligence services; a man whose expertise, advice and
friendship the Princess came to rely on."

Soon after her divorce from Prince Charles, Diana wrote in a letter to Mr Burrell: "This phase in my life is the most
dangerous". Afraid that she was about to be assassinated, Diana decided to leave a written record naming those who
were plotting her downfall. In a letter dated October 1996, Diana identified one of the key individuals who she
suspected was "planning an accident in my car".

Ten months after she wrote that letter, her prediction came true. Princess Diana and her lover Mr Dodi Fayed were
killed early on the morning of 31 August 1997 when their Mercedes, driven by chauffeur Henri Paul, crashed in the
Pont D'Alma road tunnel in Paris, France. The events surrounding Diana's death are cloaked by a catalogue of
unexplained anomalies and unanswered questions, which have led the majority of people in Britain to doubt the official
explanation that she died by accident.

The Daily Mirror became the first newspaper to report the news that Diana named the person who was planning to
have her killed in a car crash. The names of the conspirator was censored - blacked out for "legal reasons". The
newspaper suggested that Diana might have been referring to "the Establishment" which they described as "an
undefined, invisible network of interlocking social circles". The newspaper also suggested that Diana "might have
been referring to the domestic intelligence service MI5" because "the Queen does not know of its secret work and
darker practices". The Queen of England herself has warned Mr Burrell that "There are powers at work in this country
about which we have no knowledge."

Diana, Princess of Wales, reported a plot to assassinate her. Diana documented her concerns in a letter that she
entrusted to the former Royal Butler, Mr Paul Burrell. She identified the man behind the plot. Diana was warned about
a conspiracy against her by a sympathetic insider. A member of the Royal Family warned the princess: "You need to
be discreet, even in your own home, because 'they' are listening all the time."

After many years of experience as a senior employee of the Royal household, Mr Burrel recalls: "It is a matter of
routine that members of government and the royal family are monitored." Princess Diana complained of being spied
upon and bugged by "dark forces". She declined the police protection provided by Scotland Yard because these
officers are considered "tools of the state". Burrell revealed that Diana was tipped-off by a private contact within the
intelligence community: "She was being cautious, not paranoic, because she was acting on sound information
received from someone who had worked for the British intelligence services; a man whose expertise, advice and
friendship the Princess came to rely on."

Soon after her divorce from Prince Charles, Diana wrote in a letter to Mr Burrell: "This phase in my life is the most
dangerous". Afraid that she was about to be assassinated, Diana decided to leave a written record naming those who
were plotting her downfall. In a letter dated October 1996, Diana identified one of the key individuals who she
suspected was "planning an accident in my car".

Ten months after she wrote that letter, her prediction came true. Princess Diana and her lover Mr Dodi Fayed were
killed early on the morning of 31 August 1997 when their Mercedes, driven by chauffeur Henri Paul, crashed in the
Pont D'Alma road tunnel in Paris, France. The events surrounding Diana's death are cloaked by a catalogue of
unexplained anomalies and unanswered questions, which have led the majority of people in Britain to doubt the official
explanation that she died by accident.

The Daily Mirror became the first newspaper to report the news that Diana named the person who was planning to
have her killed in a car crash. The names of the conspirator was censored - blacked out for "legal reasons". The
newspaper suggested that Diana might have been referring to "the Establishment" which they described as "an
undefined, invisible network of interlocking social circles". The newspaper also suggested that Diana "might have
been referring to the domestic intelligence service MI5" because "the Queen does not know of its secret work and
darker practices". The Queen of England herself has warned Mr Burrell that "There are powers at work in this country
about which we have no knowledge."

No mainstream source has mentioned H.R,H. Prince Edward, Duke of Kent or his secret society connections. We at
the "Insider" are the first to name him. His Royal Highness, Prince Edward George Nicholas Paul Patrick, has been
Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England, the governing body of Freemasonry in England and Wales.
Prince Edward has served in that office since 1967.British Freemasonry since 1967. This powerful role as the most
senior Freemason carries the title "The Most Worshipful". As the cousin of the British monarch, Queen Elizabeth II he
is also Field Marshall of the Knights of the Garter (an elite medieval chivalrous Order based on Holy Grail mythology),
as well as Hereditary Grand Master of Anglo-American Freemasonry, and holds a pleithora of other influential
positions which mean nothing to outsiders



                                      Prince Edward's status as a senior member of the British Royal family, together with his  
                                      high-ranking position in the world's most established secret societies, give Prince
                                      Edward unparalleled influence and privileged access to high-ranking officials in the
                                      intelligence and security services throughout the world. Wittingly or unwittingly, Diana,
                                      Princess of Wales created a problem for the establishment. Her high-profile campaign
                                      against land mines threatened to undermine the UK's single most economically
                                      important industry - the international arms trade. Her sons are the sole heirs to the
                                      British throne, and Diana was becoming too popular and too powerful. Somehow, she
                                      had to be stopped. A few centuries ago a courtier in Diana's position could be easily
                                      disposed of at the Tower of London, but these days the authorities are more
                                      sophisticated.



"You must conceal all crimes of your brother Masons...and should you be summoned as a witness against a
brother Mason be always sure to shield him...It may be perjury to do this, it is true, but you're keeping your
obligations."

Ronayne
Handbook of Masonry


The Masonic symbology ("all seeing" eye, black and white tiles, triple turrents etc.)
and terminology (Grand Lodge, Brethren, etc.) used by the premier
Police Association is no co-incidence.  



Of all the professions the law enforcement and intelligence community have the highest percentage of members who
are Freemasons. This also is no co-incidence as Freemasonry intentionally seeks out new recruits who it finds the
most useful.

Unfortunately organized crime has long been aware of this, and the more sophisticated criminals have used
Freemasonry in their continual attempts to corrupt the justice system and 'gain an edge'.

It is for this reason that the British Government has recently put in to place a registration system for all police officers,
judges, magistrates, prosecutors, prison guards, and parole officers in the U.K. who are 'on the level'.

Some people are afraid to ask what's really going on in the world, but The Insider is not afraid to tell you!






Date Posted: 05/03/12

Another "Unlawful Killing"?? Hmmmm...






Gareth Williams, an employee of GCHQ seconded to the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), was found dead in
suspicious circumstances at a Security Services safe house flat in Pimlico, London, on August 23, 2010.
Reportedly an intensely private man and a keen cyclist, Williams was due to return to Cheltenham at the beginning of
September 2010.

Due to the nature of his work, it is hard for those who met Gareth to describe what he did, and those who talked to us
did so having already left GCHQ. But all agreed that, although very capable, Williams was "a middle-ranking"
technician "asserting himself in a number of sensitive areas, any one of which could theoretically have brought him
into contact with enemies of our state". While GCHQ gathers intelligence from Europe, Africa and Russia, its partners
in the US National Security Agency (NSA) also had access to British and European signals traffic at Menwith Hill, a top-
secret RAF base near Harrogate, in Yorkshire.

When Williams arrived at Menwith, shortly after the invasion of Iraq in March 2003, GCHQ and the NSA were
increasingly focused on the threat of Islamist violence at home and abroad. "Between the UK and the US, we were
deluged by the chatter from radicals here and over the Atlantic as they talked on landlines, satellite or mobile phones
– with contacts in hot countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as with Saudi, and hubs like Dubai," one former
GCHQ security consultant said. "A group around Williams worked on software to assemble, search and analyse the
data, drawing out patterns and meanings."

Williams's elevation within GCHQ came with the "Liquid Bomb" plot, where a group of British radicals of Asian origin
were found to be planning to detonate home-made explosives on board seven flights to major north American cities.
Intercepting emails and phone calls between these plotters and their contacts abroad, Williams flew between the UK
and the US, working at Fort Meade (the NSA HQ, in Baltimore).

Williams was brought into close proximity to US intelligence, Islamic radicals and Middle Eastern agents. He would rub
shoulders with the Russians, too, according to a foreign intelligence analyst based in the UK, who described how
technology and software honed by GCHQ was deployed in tracking a Moscow-backed sleeper cell to which Britain had
been alerted as early as 2003. The case blew up in June 2010 when 10 people were arrested in the US and accused
of being part of an espionage ring. One of them, a glamorous 28-year-old called Anna Chapman, had lived for five
years in the UK. According to the former GCHQ contractor, "Williams had been obsessed by the case, its methodology
and characters."

He was now on secondment to MI6, with its focus on foreign targets and intelligence-gathering, becoming more of a
spy than a desk-bound technician, although Williams would shortly be called back to GCHQ to work on a new and
ambitious project.

He had been liaising again with counterparts at the NSA, who were part of an effort to create an American cyber
defence policy, to prevent the siphoning off of secret or commercially sensitive data or a military style assault on
defence or civil systems. Its importance was alluded to last month in a speech by home secretary Theresa May, in
which she identified cyber crime as among the pre-eminent future threats facing the UK. A cyber crimes specialist who
knew Williams revealed that at the time of his death he was researching British vulnerability to Russian, Turkish and
Chinese gangs: "He was already on top of it."

Coroner Dr Fiona Wilcox has told that decomposition, accelerated by his position in the bag during a hot summer
month in his heated flat, hindered their investigations.The dead man’s MI6 boss has been criticised for failing to act
decisively until seven days after he failed to turn up for work. The explanation from his line manager lacked credibility,
she said, and she could "only speculate as to what effect this [delay] had on the investigation".

In a dramatic narrative verdict, Dr Fiona Wilcox told Westminster coroner's court it was a 'legitimate line of inquiry' that
the codebreaker was killed by a colleague, as he would only have let someone he trusted into his home. 'The cause
of his death was unnatural and likely to have been criminally mediated,' she said.
'I am therefore satisfied that on
the balance of probabilities Gareth was killed unlawfully'.

Returning to the holdall, studying the zips and lock, police became certain that he could not have locked himself
inside. And there was further proof that someone else must have been in the flat with him: his front door had been
locked from the outside. Vincent Williams from the Metropolitan Police informed the Westminster Coroner's Court that
experts were agreed that it was impossible for Gareth Williams to have locked himself in.

Passing a narrative verdict, Dr. Wilcox said she was satisfied that "a third party placed the bag in the bath and on the
balance of probabilities locked the bag".

The lawyer for the Secret Intelligence Service, Andrew O'Connor, delivered deep regrets and an unprecedented
apology to the family from Sir John Sawers, chief of the SIS, who recognised that "failure to act more swiftly" when
Williams was absent had contributed to their "anguish and suffering".

Officers in the Met's counter-terrorism branch, SO15, whose role was to interview SIS witnesses, were also strongly
criticised. SO15 failed to inform DCI Jackie Sebire, senior investigating officer, of the existence of nine memory sticks
and a black holdall found at Williams's MI6 office until two days before the inquest ended, the coroner said. On
discovering this, Wilcox said she had seriously questioned whether she should adjourn the inquest at that point.

No formal statements were taken by S015 officers who interviewed Williams's colleagues, "and I find this did affect the
quality of evidence heard in this court," she said.

She also criticised the handling of an iPhone belonging to Williams and found in his work locker, which contained
deleted images of him naked in a pair of boots. The officer involved kept it in his possession before handing it to
homicide detectives the following day, "demonstrating disregard for the rules governing continuity of evidence", she
said.

Many agencies "fell short of the ideal", she said, including LGC Forensics in relation to DNA contamination, and the
coroner's office for failing to inform police officers of a second postmortem.

Williams, a fitness fanatic from Anglesey, north Wales, was probably alive when put in the bag but probably suffocated
very soon afterwards either from CO2 poisoning, hypercapnia, or the effects of a short-acting poison, she said.

Scotland Yard has always treated the death as suspicious and unexplained, but held back from describing it as
murder or manslaughter. Recording her verdict, Wilcox stated her belief that a criminal hand was involved, although
police said afterwards that there was no evidence of this. The Guardian understands police inquiries have focused on
the theory that Williams died accidentally in a private sexual liaison that went wrong. The coroner made it clear that in
her opinion no evidence presented itself to suggest bondage and sexual games were played resulting in his death.






G.C.H.Q--- where Mr. Williams was
employed, though his being on "loan"
to MI6 at the time of his death.





The Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) is a British intelligence agency responsible for providing
signals intelligence(SIGINT) and information assurance to the UK government and armed forces. Based in
Cheltenham it operates under the guidance of the Joint Intelligence Committee.Much of GCHQ’s work involves
monitoring telephone calls and emails from terrorism suspects.




" I have said that corruptions and deceptions are being exposed and that this is something that will continue. These
things have always gone on of course but more and more we are seeing that public exposure of them is happening and
this something that will continue. As someone who was intent having documented evidence of the reality of it-- doing
my homework-- that deliberate genocide was taking place in Angola and Bosnia regarding the landmines I can and will
only encourage that more and more deceptions and corruptions happening globally in all manner of ways are
systematically exposed as it is time for this to happen now. It is time for people to wake up and be forced to become
personally aware of the reality of things in ways many people never have before!"

                                               With love from,

                                                                      Diana xx